>>5998564 (lb)
Remember that Trump quietly expanded and reauthorized the NDAA for another six years. There was no debate. There was no discussion. Most of you probably missed that too.
He's one of the best and most loyal Constitutionalists that we have.
If you saw his rant on Hannity last week, it was magnificent. If Trump were smart he'd use the whole thing verbatim in a 2020 election ad.
https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2019/03/25/fox-s-mark-levin-accuses-anti-american-democrats-treason/223240
Agreed. Well said.
>Remember that Trump quietly expanded and reauthorized the NDAA for another six years. There was no debate. There was no discussion.
Please note that this is the law that authorizes the unConstitutional FISA court.
Late in the evening on Monday, Aug. 13, about six hours after President Donald Trump publicly signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal 2019 into law, the White House quietly released a signing statement identifying “constitutional concerns” with more than 50 of the new NDAA’s provisions.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-make-trumps-ndaa-signing-statement
If Trump really wanted to return power to the American people, he should have fought to roll back the federal surveillance state and reassert the Fourth Amendment. Instead he expanded it (sauce above) and reauthorized it. Why? I can't think of any reason other than to keep power in the hands of the power brokers. We remain at their mercy as long as that law is in place.
Late in the evening on Monday, Aug. 13, about six hours after President Donald Trump publicly signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal 2019 into law, the White House quietly released a signing statement identifying “constitutional concerns” with more than 50 of the new NDAA’s provisions.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-make-trumps-ndaa-signing-statement
If Trump really wanted to return power to the American people, he should have fought to roll back the federal surveillance state and reassert the Fourth Amendment. Instead he expanded it (sauce above) and reauthorized it. Why? I can't think of any reason other than to keep power in the hands of the power brokers. We remain at their mercy as long as that law is in place.
>"Is Barack Obama the only human being on the planet who didn't know anything [about the warrant to spy]?" Levin asked. Solomon said Obama needs to be formally interviewed by the feds on what he knew and when he knew it. "Why wasn't [Obama] interested in Russian collusion before the election but [was interested] after the election?" he asked.
Just think about all the "scandals" (crimes!) King Nig presided over:
Fast and Furious
IRS targeting tea party
Eric fucking Holder's constant stonewalling
Benghazi
Seal Team Six
The Iran Deal
The Paris Agreement (whatever it was called)
The hostage debacle
The pallets of cash to Iran
The Coup to overthrow the people's duly elected President.
A million other things we know about.
A million others we don't.
If there was ever a fucker that should hang it's him!
Every judge he appointed should have been kicked to the curb already. Every law that he signed should be wiped off the books.
>Trust Wray, too.
No, I do not. The criminals are still running the FBI. There's no reason to believe otherwise. Same for the rest of the intel agencies. We've seen no change in how they operate. We've seen no results. At CPAC, Tom Fitton said the FBI is still slow walking FOIA requests. Why would that be if Wray wasn't just another deep state turd?
That would fucking rule.