>>6013759 (pb)
Just an Anons theory on Huber, and sealed filings
Could it be that Huber doesnt NEED to interview witnesses because he has it all - emails, documents, keylogs of intel systems, text messages, phone records, and access to already extant congressional testimony? If you have access to NSA data, do you need witnesses? Any comms to a foreign country would be intercepted (as we learned w Flynn) such that the NSA would have them and likely have tranaceipts, so that covers comms with the plants where insertion was attempted into the Trump campaign.
No need to interview people if you have Rock solid evidence of abuse, particularly if those abuses started prior to the opening of Crossfire Hurricane. Even less so if you have access to the "door of all doors": the NSA data collection.
Huber really does likely have every. Damn. Thing. The 80k sealed filings are likely related to showing national security data to Grand juries all over the country, which by law they are required to file:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
Rule 6(e)(3)(D)(ii):
(ii) Within a reasonable time after disclosure is made underRule 6(e)(3)(D), an attorney for the government must file, under seal, a notice with the court in the district where the grand jury convened stating that such information was disclosed and the departments, agencies, or entities to which the disclosure was made.
Those sealed docs are Huber's artifacts, and he's using a fuck ton of NSA-sourced data, and its legal because this was a coup involving government agents & foreign government agents.