>>6017270

>>6017289

Q posted twice on April 30th last year.

>>6017270 → >>6017329

>>6017237

Um.. you OK, Baker? …why is a 10-month-old WL twat in notables?

Some new relevance? Notable blurb makes it sound like a new thing but kek it's old af.

>>6017437

>Original Notable had link only. Wanted the text and name posted on the bread.

notable