Anonymous ID: 7988b2 April 2, 2019, 7:55 a.m. No.6017255   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7282 >>7715

>>6017237

TY Baker!!!

 

>Bread title

Ain't that the truth…

 

New DJT:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1113091756130742273

“I haven’t seen any Democrats down here at the Border working with us or asking to speak to any of us. They have an open invitation. We are getting overrun, our facilities are overcapacity. We are at an emergency crisis.” Art Del Cueto, National Border Patrol Council.

Anonymous ID: 7988b2 April 2, 2019, 8:08 a.m. No.6017379   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7722 >>7807

>>6017254

The brilliance of the DJT retweet of that Dershowitz interview is amazing. Dershowitz is literally defending people that are going to get caught up in the crossfire of the revealings of the redacted AG report based on the Mueller report. Due process of law. I take that as evidence that this is going to end really badly for the Dems, as many people are going to get exposed in the full report, and the plan is to give the DS every opportunity, under the law, to defend themselves. But as Q has said:

 

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: e8d9e2 No.2614164 📁

Aug 15 2018 15:17:25 (EST)

 

Anonymous ID: fcdac6 No.2613853 📁

Aug 15 2018 14:58:53 (EST)

GMAIL Drafts have them terrified, Q-Team!

 

You sent shock waves to the netherworld!!

 

>>2613853

Did they ask Combetta for advice?

These people are stupid.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-19/paul-combetta-computer-specialist-who-deleted-hillary-clinton-emails-may-have-asked-reddit-for-tips📁

>>Oprah Show

You get to go to JAIL.

You get to go to JAIL.

You get to go to JAIL.

You get to go to JAIL.

You ALL get to go to JAIL.

Q

Anonymous ID: 7988b2 April 2, 2019, 8:19 a.m. No.6017541   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7576

>>6017364

>>6017391

Well, it does bear repeating from time to time. New folks might still think WL is a "really really awesome place!". If it's included in notables again, it might be worth stating with a link to the Q posts pointing out that WL is comped. Just a thought.

Anonymous ID: 7988b2 April 2, 2019, 8:39 a.m. No.6017747   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7757 >>7765 >>7792

>>6017719

It's a mistake to deride a baker including something in notables that provides a valid perspective as to why WL is a comped AF organization that is against Q. I don't care if 8 different bakers per day include it in notables. If anons and bakers think it's notable, then a mistake wasn't made.

Anonymous ID: 7988b2 April 2, 2019, 8:46 a.m. No.6017808   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7818

>>6017781

Take note. "anons" used a poison pill tactic to get you to remove something you deemed notable in your own bread, then when anon took your side the "anons" attacked.

 

That's not what we do here. Now they are going to start going after other notables to gauge how you fair in standing your ground.

 

Hang in there, baker. You do what you think is right. Don't let the shills fuck with your discernment.