Anonymous ID: ba4f8f April 2, 2019, 8:26 a.m. No.6017619   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Pete Buttigieg's father was a Marxist professor who lauded the Communist Manifesto

 

The father of Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg was a Marxist professor who spoke fondly of the Communist Manifesto and dedicated a significant portion of his academic career to the work of Italian Communist Party founder Antonio Gramsci, an associate of Vladimir Lenin. Joseph Buttigieg, who died in January at the age of 71, immigrated to the U.S. in the 1970s from Malta and in 1980 joined the University of Notre Dame faculty, where he taught modern European literature and literary theory. He supported an updated version of Marxism that jettisoned some of Marx and Engel's more doctrinaire theories, though he was undoubtedly Marxist. He was an adviser to Rethinking Marxism, an academic journal that published articles “that seek to discuss, elaborate, and/or extend Marxian theory,” and a member of the editorial collective of Boundary 2, a journal of postmodern theory, literature, and culture. He spoke at many Rethinking Marxism conferences and other gatherings of prominent Marxists.

 

In a 2000 paper for Rethinking Marxism critical of the approach of Human Rights Watch, Buttigieg, along with two other authors, refers to "the Marxist project to which we subscribe." In 1998, he wrote in an article for the Chronicle of Higher Education about an event in New York City celebrating the 150th anniversary of the Manifesto. He also participated in the event. "If The Communist Manifesto was meant to liberate the proletariat, the Manifesto itself in recent years needed liberating from Marxism's narrow post-Cold War orthodoxies and exclusive cadres. It has been freed," he wrote. "After a musical interlude, seven people read different portions of the Manifesto. Listening to it read, one could not help but be struck by the poignancy of its prose," he wrote. The readers "had implicitly warned even us faithful to guard against conferring upon it the status of Scripture, a repository of doctrinal verities." “Equity, environmental consciousness, and racial justice are surely some of the ingredients of a healthy Marxism. Indeed, Marxism's greatest appeal — undiminished by the collapse of Communist edifices — is the imbalances produced by other sociopolitical governing structures,” Buttigieg wrote.

 

Paul Kengor, a professor at Grove City College and an expert in communism and progressivism, said Buttigieg was among a group of leftist professors who focused on injecting Marxism into the wider culture. "They’re part of a wider international community of Marxist theorists and academicians with a particular devotion to the writings of the late Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci, who died over 80 years ago. Gramsci was all about applying Marxist theory to culture and cultural institutions — what is often referred to as a 'long march through the institutions,' such as film, media, and especially education," Kengor told the Washington Examiner.

 

Pete Buttigieg, an only child, shared a close relationship with his father. In his memoir Shortest Way Home, Pete called his dad a “man of the left, no easy thing on a campus like Notre Dame’s in the 1980s.” He wrote that while he did not understand his parents’ political discussions as a young child, “the more I heard these aging professors talk, the more I wanted to learn how to decrypt their sentences, and to grasp the political backstory of the grave concerns that commanded their attention and aroused such fist-pounding dinner debate.” Pete wrote that his dad was supportive when he came out as gay. He and his husband bought a house in South Bend around the corner from his parents, which gave the couple “a good support network despite our work and travel schedules” when they decided to get a dog.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/pete-buttigiegs-father-was-a-marxist-professor-who-lauded-the-communist-manifesto

Anonymous ID: ba4f8f April 2, 2019, 8:39 a.m. No.6017751   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7781 >>7790 >>7934

Eric Holder wants Mueller report out, but argued against full transparency after Starr report

 

Former Attorney General Eric Holder joined the chorus Democrats calling for the full release of special counsel Robert Mueller's final report, but in the wake of the Starr report he made the opposite argument. Speaking with Ari Mebler on MSNBC last Monday, Holder said, “You look at the letter and you’re trying to figure how much of this is Barr, how much of this is Mueller, how much of this is based on the Mueller findings?… Congress and the public are going to have to get access to the Mueller report.” Yet back in 1999, when he was deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration, Holder's position was starkly different. “Although there is a legitimate concern that the American people have a right to know the outcome of an investigation of their highest officials, the reporting requirement goes directly against most traditions and practices of law enforcement and American ideals," he said after the completion of independent counsel Ken Starr's investigation.

 

At the time, the Justice Department was governed by the independent counsel statute which was supported by many Democrats from the time of the Watergate era up until Starr started investigating former President Bill Clinton. Then-Attorney General Janet Reno's DOJ came out in opposition to the independent counsel statute in 1999 and it lapsed. The Clinton administration replaced it with the current and more restricting special counsel regulations, which Attorney General William Barr cited in his letter to Congress and could explain why the Mueller report that gets made public might not end up showing the same level of detail as the Starr report. Reno would speak in front of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee on May 14, 1993, urging them to reauthorize the independent counsel statute. “It is my firm conviction that the law has been a good one, helping to restore public confidence in our system's ability to investigate wrongdoing by high-level Executive Branch officials,” she said. The law was reauthorized the next year.

 

But, in 1994, Starr was appointed as independent counsel to investigate the Clinton-related Whitewater scandal, and he would carry out his investigation for four years. In September 1998, it culminated in the release of the Starr report — which was full of salacious details about Clinton's affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky — and ultimately led to the impeachment of Clinton in December 1998. The Starr report was around 445 pages long, while Mueller's report is nearly 400 pages in length according to Barr. By the time of the Starr report, the independent counsel law had fallen out of favor with Clinton’s Justice Department. Reno sent Holder to speak in front of the House Judiciary's Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee on March 2, 1999, where he revealed that the DOJ was officially opposing the reauthorization of the law.

 

Holder testified that a major flaw with the independent counsel law was its reporting requirements, which allowed non-criminal but potentially politically damaging information to be made public. “A final problem … is the Act's requirement that a final report be prepared by the Independent Counsel," he said. “It is contrary to our concept of a presumption of innocence, our placing of high value on rights of privacy, and our Departmental tradition that we reveal offenses in the courtroom during a criminal trial, not by filing a document that is never filed when we decline to prosecute ordinary criminal cases and that may reveal information that subjects an individual to public embarrassment," he said. “But worst of all … the reporting requirement provides an incentive for Independent Counsel to over-investigate every detail in order to avoid criticism that their final reports missed something." Twenty years later, Holder is striking a different tone.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/eric-holder-wants-mueller-report-out-but-argued-against-full-transparency-after-starr-report

Anonymous ID: ba4f8f April 2, 2019, 8:49 a.m. No.6017839   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7886 >>7934 >>7947 >>7982 >>7993

Valerie Jarrett: I still haven’t accepted Trump is president

 

Valerie Jarrett, a senior White House adviser to former President Barack Obama, writes in her new book that she still hasn’t accepted President Trump won the 2016 election. "Since the night Donald Trump became president, I’ve been going through the five stages of grief, sometimes all five in the same day,” Jarrett writes in Finding My Voice: My Journey to the West Wing and the Path Forward, according to Axios. "In the beginning, denial and anger were high on the list; I still haven't embraced acceptance,” she writes. Jarrett, a longtime adviser to Obama and his wife Michelle, said that Trump's unexpected victory against Hillary Clinton felt “like a punch to the stomach.” “Obviously we were surprised by the outcome of the election. It kind of was like a, I’m not sure what the right analogy would be, but like a punch in the stomach, let’s say. Soul-crushing might be another description,” Jarrett said at the time. “But that’s the democracy that we have: The people get to decide and the elections matter and we have to get about the business of doing our job.”

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/valerie-jarrett-i-still-havent-accepted-trump-is-president