Ty, baker
>>6017296 (ALL LB)
All reply to LB topic on chemtrails
Until Q addresses chemtrails, which he's addressed just about everything else, then he's not trustworthy. I'm not denying any Q proof. I'm just saying he's not 100% trustworthy.
That being said, neither is the civilian population. Too many of us are under direct programming of cabal machinations. If it's a sedative, it's to quell the misguided anger. If it's weather control, perhaps white hats are reverse engineering climate issues which were caused by cabal's induced droughts for example.
It could have some other purpose which I won't speculate, but the bottom line is, there doesn't seem to be a consensus amongst any theorists.
Waves… we can only take so much build-up. Can't be constantly building up.
We'd get exhausted.
Same with news cycles.
I think everything hit a massive climax with the report coming out, and it was several days of coming down off that climax. Now it's a bunch of scattered non-news type demands before the new course of action.
New build-up date is speculative, Barr's release with necessary redactions.
Waves of the Great Awakening ocean hitting sleepers.
Tons of people woked from the 4 page summary.
Tons still dreaming.
They get the same treatment until their walls erode and the water hits them.
Using that rationale, explain why Q would withhold chemtrail information.
I did, but that's supposed to make me warm and fuzzy?
Are there not several different country's leaders inspecting planes?
Photoshop
That's the sorriest excuse I've ever heard.
So you're saying that Q can address things like FE, Aliens, and JFK Jr, because those are more important than chem trails?