Anonymous ID: 5faca7 April 2, 2019, 8:35 p.m. No.6026785   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Whether it's this simulation software or some other, this is how the plan is developed. This is how we continue to win even though we have some setbacks the outcome is managed by a military operation using process management through simulation software. It accounts for how the dates and times are predetermined. It accounts for Q repeating trust the plan. And, it accounts for Q telling (((them))), "this is not a game:"

 

:::::From the promotional content of cra.com case studies website::::::

 

Deep Green/ A decision support system to model and evaluate military courses of action

 

Deep Green was successfully demonstrated at the Army's Mission Command Battle Lab at Fort Leavenworth where the operational benefits of both mission planning and execution phases were assessed. Charles River's approach provides a novel interface that allows Commanders and their staffs to visualize large numbers of possible battle outcomes to rapidly develop contingency plans, both before and during combat operations. The suite of information views provides progressively more detailed information upon request to answer questions and make well-informed decisions.

 

As a whole Deep Green was designed to interleave anticipatory planning with adaptive execution to help the Commander think ahead, identify when a plan is going awry, and prepare options—before they are needed. Deep Green aimed to help Commanders visualize and predict possible future states of the battlefield based on the automated monitoring of the executing mission and current operational picture. Ultimately, Deep Green would help Army brigade and battalion Commanders and their staffs develop more intelligent, reactive battle plans that better penetrate the fog of war.

 

https://www.cra.com/work/case-studies/deep-green