Subpoena served to St. Louis County casts wide net; council votes to release it to public:

https://www.kmov.com/news/subpoena-served-to-st-louis-county-casts-wide-net-council/article_b180607c-559c-11e9-8d70-3b89387a1cae.html

Stenger gets fucked!

"The three page document basically asks for every document related to county contracts since Stenger’s first day in office. It specifically asks for emails, texts and notes related to decisions made regarding contracts."

But see, the interesting thing I noticed, is that the subpoena specifically requests any documents (or more generally, communications) between Stenger's county government and the ST LOUIS PORT AUTHORITY.

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/kmov.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/3/fa/3faeb790-559d-11e9-9cfb-9f4ca0fae5e6/5ca3ed511f1dc.pdf.pdf

Now. Consider the fact that St. Louis is a port. Know what gets moved in and out of ports? Lots of things…

EYES ON, ANONS… WIDE FUCKIN OPEN.

>>6026725

Meant to include as pics but faggot computer saved as pdf and I didn't catch it. Anyone who gives a shit is welcomed to repost the images of the Grand Jury Subpoena.

Melania is calling out the freemasons. Again.

First with the owl picture (the beak is the silhouette of the compass and square. People always focus on the eyes, but its the beak thats important). And now with these pillars. The color may be important as well, considering the Washington Masonic Apron…

Just saying.

>>6027055

More owl = masons for reference.

MELANIA IS CALLING OUT THE MASONS.

NOTABLE.

>>6027087

>>6027055

Suggested decode.

>>6027125

Because there is clearly a pattern. Do you not see the resemblance between the Washington Masonic Apron and the post by Melania? Q has repeatedly called out the "owls" yet nobody knows about what the "owls" are, for some mysterious reason. Are you telling me Melania had a photo taken in front of owls as a "coincidence?" I mean honestly, how many hints does it take? At what point does it become mathematically impossible?

Why have the freemasons NEVER ONCE made notables?

>>6027194

No I'm serious. Q has talked about it but I don't recall anything an anon has ever posted relevant to that topic ever making notables. Seriously, consider that what I said about the Melania tweets regardless of me being the person saying it.

>>6027240

They have appeared in Q posts, but bakers have never once added anything an anon has posted about them to notables.

>>6027222

Message received, anon.

Flak when over target.