>>6029655 (lb)

Stop with the revisionist history, anon. Reagan was no hero. He was a pos. He signed NSC3 in December, 1981, nine months after he was 'shot'. That authorized GHWB to create his own, parallel executive, which coordinated arms and drug trafficking (including into this nation), laundered illicit proceeds, promoted regime change bs including Operation Condor fvckery, and lied to Congress and the American people.

And, despite his administration being responsible for permitting drug trafficking into the US, and being partly responsible for the crack cocaine epidemic, he trotted out his retarded wife to tell commoners to "Just Say No."

The guy was an actor, and a scumbag. He's the one who started the 'terrorism' rhetoric that gets so much play these days, despite being a product of the imperium. That Q selectively quotes the fool doesn't make it anything but illustrative of how uneducated most people truly are.

I'm sick of it. Cut it tf out. It makes us look stupid as hell.

>>6031429

You must be eleven years old.

I don't give a flying shit if he was 'in control' or not. He was POTUS, and he presided over atrocity. He also lied to Americans, and disingenuously promoted shit he knew was garbage.

This place is filled with uneducated children content to regurgitate falsehoods and revisionism if it fits the narrative being pushed.

Want me to quote you the times Q has quoted that pos Reagan? Calling him an 'outsider', and comparing him to JFK?

Stop drinking the kool aid. It's no wonder so many people think this place is a joke.

>>6031454

And green light every CIA plot on the menu. Idiots who have zero relevant education don't have any sense of who was around him, and who installed him. They keep posting shit about him. It just serves to prove how herdlike people are.

>>6031483

People who facilitate CIA bullshit should be called out on it, regardless of who they are or where they're from.

People who have no education but insist on regurgitating some garbage that's inconsistent with facts should be called out, also.

Apologies for shitting the bread. It was inadvertant.

>>6031547

Reagan was the first President to start citing 'terrorism' constantly.

Carter, to his credit, started cleaning out CIA, despite or perhaps in part due to his approval of Brzezinski's CIA machinations with the mujahedeen. Carter also gave Panama the canal. He pissed off lots of establishment tools.

Remember the 'October surprise'? What a coincidence. Reagan, impotent tool or not, deserves no esteem. He should not be quoted out of context of what his administration sponsored. Only children make excuses for douchebags.

>>6031574

Q is also giving anons the false impression that Fox News is anything but controlled opposition and corporate media, despite being a Murdoch property and being run for years by a CFR acolyte.

Comparing Reagan to JFK is beyond disingenuous. Yet, that's what we get. And anons with no sense of history eat it up. We look like retards.

There has to be some way to critically examine bullshit and dispel revisionist notions, no matter how they feed the narrative. We're not the news if we're falling for weak assertions based in falsehoods - or, we're no better than most 'news'.

>>6031679

I'm waiting to see if the 'Russiagate' distraction, that any anon with a lick of sense realizes was initiated by (SIS/)CIA assets way out in front of it, will be pinned squarely on 44's administration, DOJ & FBI, when we should all realize he was little more than a hapless pawn of British intelligence, like so many before him.

If this gets a bow tied on it to keep the fallout exclusive to this side of the Atlantic, we'll all know it was meant as a distraction, and has nothing to do with exposing the kingmakers.

Wondering if the declassification that was put off was done to buy time for the elite to clean up their Brexit mess and the inconvenient protests of the elites' hand picked tool across the channel. Delay seems to have only served their interests, and if this gets played as a 'Democrat' plot (as opposed to a plot that appropriated the party 'in power'), then we're all getting the shaft.

>>6031733

All good points. The whole 'trust the plan' rhetoric makes me worry this was a way to placate certain antiestablishment constituencies and bring them back 'into the fold'.

No 'Yellow Vests' needed if everyone had faith in the political class, or any member of it, working against the masters. That's never happened, mind you.

There are plenty of important topics that anons could dig on & use to enlighten others, but the focus should always be on speaking truth to power - not sycophantic adoration of a politician. I voted for the guy, but if anyone thinks he's going to get support for CIA regime change plots or caving to that proxy Israel, they're confused about why folks voted for him in 2016.

Of course, our betters will run some 'progressive' moron - so, once again, no real choice. It's disconcerting.

>>6031709

Which point would you like demonstrated in fact? I have time.

>>6031836

Appreciate the contribution. That op was so blatantly absurd, as if funding fascists wouldn't obviously recall memories of European elites funding Nazis. Same bs, over and over. And this administration can't seem to realize that continued meddling in foreign affairs should be denounced, not tacitly supported - despite all the campaign rhetoric for votes. Blinders are half off this week. Get em while they're hot.

>>6031953

The reason Congress is supposed to oversee the Executive is because Congress as representatives are closer to the people, and Reps more so than Senators.

You can't pretend the Executive, and all of its expanded powers and all of its appointments, is somehow beholden to the people more so than the guy or gal who has to run every two years, and so is constantly running, and constantly in threat of being ousted.

>>6031911

The only way I see real change coming (not 'Hope and Change' bs for a different disaffected constituency to uncritically lap up while the administration is filled with establishment pawns) is if people start organizing and protesting.

Notice how all that shit got quashed? That's what elites do. They feed commoners false expectations of change in prepackaged quantities, and most folks go for it.

The french have the right idea. We're hopelessly placated to 'be patient' and wait it out - which never results in change. Never.

>>6032143

When will we draw the line on bullshit?

"So, friends, let me go on record: anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism," Pompeo said. "The Trump administration opposes it unequivocally and we will fight for it relentlessly."

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/how-democrats-and-republicans-fell-over-themselves-appeal-aipac-crowd