We love new bakers, go for it.
Ask for whatever help you need as you go.
Thanks for stepping up too, baker
>Where do you power level discernment for notables?
Not enough discipline in your upbringing?
>We can make it #BeBest day, why not?
>why not?
Sure, where's the harm in making random shit up and calling it true?
On a research board whose stated mission is to deal in facts & reasoned argument in order to replace Fake News at the pleasure of the President of the United States.
>The other thing to keep in mind is parallel construction. If something drops and "anons knew" then maybe in the emotional algebra of turning the ship of state, that drop needs to hit the normies in the feels NOW in this six hour moment of the Overton window …
Can you expand on what you mean here as to baking operations?
Not sure if you're making an emotional appeal argument to include unsauced/unverified factual claims in notables on the assumption that sometimes Q might want us to.
Yeah we could do that.
Creates a nice water cooler effect to have it all go down in one central location, but combining the two functions does mean they either work as a single unit or fail as a single unit. The latter happens often enough that separating the two functions has merit.
Gotcha. Thanks baker.
kek, cheers m8