Man, baker, you must be on a roll! Here since the four-baker bread? Great breads, way to go.
jpegs are a problem. invisible this bread.
Yes, I know. But still doesn't happen all the time (hence the Global Notable).
Entirely agree. It bothers me when successful people like Candace get attacked seemingly just because they are successful. Critiquing people is fine–as long as you have real evidence of something amiss. But these vague charges that someone is a "paytriot" run counter to what we are fighting for: the American free enterprise system.
White supremacy can be very diverse. Opportunities for all groups to participate.
This Q post says it all. UNITY IS WHAT MATTERS MOST.
But it's not just shills who criticize people like PM (who accept donations or sell stuff) but anons who hold something of a narrow view of what it means to "follow Q." Which is why, IMO, Q always encourages us to broaden our thinking. That way, we don't look like–or behave like–blind followers. We each have to use our own discernment to decide whom to follow. And to focus moar on what we share than on how we differ.
Fine to discuss differences but with circumspection. None of us are perfect. Being anon does not confer anything special. Just a choice we make about how to serve.
This is why we speak up, anon. To remind one another of the importance of UNITY. Ironically, such a discussion sometimes causes friction.
The ability to disagree with someone while at the same time standing firm in one's commitment to a shared vision, mission, cause, etc., is not always easy but is worth cultivating in a group such as ours. However much we might take issue with a particular anon's ideas, in the end, we are all FAMILY.
only equality under God
I suggest you read what I said much more carefully. Unless you're a shill; there's not much I can say in that case.
Foolish question, anon, unless you're really new or a shill.
The only thing I'm losing confidence in is my ability to maintain continued patience with shills.
never mind the climate change part