Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 5:23 a.m. No.6162058   🗄️.is 🔗kun

NEW POTUS

@realDonaldTrump

Why should Radical Left Democrats in Congress have a right to retry and examine the $35,000,000 (two years in the making) No Collusion Mueller Report, when the crime committed was by Crooked Hillary, the DNC and Dirty Cops? Attorney General Barr will make the decision!

Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 5:54 a.m. No.6162181   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2196 >>2362 >>2625 >>2671

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT WON’T INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE WAR CRIMES IN AFGHANISTAN

The International Criminal Court (ICC) said Friday it will not pursue an investigation into possible war crimes committed during the war in Afghanistan.

 

After 18 months of debate, the ICC “rejected unanimously the request of the Prosecutor to proceed with an investigation for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes, on the territory of in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan,” according to a Friday statement.

 

The court’s chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda requested authorization in November 2017 to start an investigation into alleged war crimes relating to the conflict in Afghanistan.

 

The ICC determined the difficulties of finding sufficient evidence outweighed its ability to pursue a meaningful and thorough investigation into alleged war crimes.

 

“[T]he current circumstances of the situation in Afghanistan are such as to make the prospects for a successful investigation and prosecution extremely limited … [and] would not serve the interests of justice,” the court said.

 

The court did find, however, that the documents and materials given to them by Bensouda establishes a “reasonable basis” that crimes likely occurred. Alleged crimes have included the torture of prisoners by American C.I.A. operatives in secret jails known as “black sites.”

 

“This is a major international victory, not only for these patriots, but for the rule of law,” the White House said in a Friday statement applauding the ICC’s decision. “We welcome this decision and reiterate our position that the United States holds American citizens to the highest legal and ethical standards.”

 

Human rights groups said the ICC kowtowed to pressure from the Trump administration.

 

“With its decision today, the International Criminal Court sends a dangerous message: that bullying wins and that the powerful won’t be held to account,” Center for Constitutional Rights lawyer Katherine Gallagher said, according to The New York Times.

 

It is “outrageous that victims of war crimes are far less likely to get justice for well-documented atrocities because of the Trump administration’s authoritarian efforts to sabotage an investigation before it could even get started,” said Jamil Dakwar, the director of the Human Rights Program at the American Civil Liberties Union, TheNYT reported.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/12/criminal-court-war-crimes-afghanistan/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter

Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 6:27 a.m. No.6162341   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Trump tweets edited video targeting Omar over 9/11 comments

http://hill.cm/OTXjIWN

 

Yes, assholes!

Trump tweets "edited" video of Omar and clips from 9/11 EDITED in, NOT editing her fucking words "Some people did some things." The Muslim said wtf she said and she meant it the way she meant it, to down play WTF happened that day! No matter how the Fake News tries to spin it, she said it!

Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 6:32 a.m. No.6162366   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2625 >>2671

ICE Acting Director To Resign On Friday

Acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) director Ron Vitiello will be stepping down from his position on Friday, marking the latest move in the Trump administration’s immigration staff shakeup.

 

Vitiello, who has served as acting ICE director since June 2018, will officially vacate his post by the end of the week, the agency has confirmed. It is not yet clear who will replace him, but acting deputy director Matthew Albence is next in line. Vitiello’s resignation follows President Donald Trump’s decision earlier in April to pull his nomination to lead the agency in an official capacity.

 

“ a good man,” the president told reporters the day after rescinding Vitiello’s nomination. “But we’re going in a tougher direction. We want to go in a tougher direction.”

https://truepundit.com/ice-acting-director-to-resign-on-friday/

Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 6:34 a.m. No.6162394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2398 >>2406 >>2419 >>2439 >>2625 >>2671

Wasserman Schultz on Trump: ‘It Really Feels More Like We Have a Comic Book Villain in the White House Than a President’

Friday on CNN, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) continued to voice her opposition to President Donald Trump, who she criticized for his immigration policies.

 

The Florida Democrat also voiced his displeasure in being barred from entering a detention center in Homestead, FL, a facility near her congressional district.

 

“To that, I say that it really feels more like we have a comic book villain in the White House than a president,” she said. “This is a president who flouts the law and has been repeatedly rejected in his outrageous, horrendous policies like these over and over. When he first became president, he tried to ban mostly immigrants from Muslim certain Muslim countries and was rejected by a court. Recently, he was just rejected by a court from requiring people seeking asylum to be held in Mexico while their asylum applications will be in process. That was rejected. He was rejected from being able to forcibly separate children from their families at the border.”

 

“He has been rejected in — repeatedly in trying to end temporary protective status for immigrants from countries that it’s dangerous for them to return to,” Wasserman Schultz continued. “Over and over and over again, this president’s policies, which are outrageous and inhumane, have been rejected by courts. And then Monday, Brooke, after myself and Congresswomen Donna Shalala and Mucarsel-Powell attempted to conduct oversight by visiting the Homestead detention center, which just announced its second expansion of more than 1,000 children — we’re going to go over 3,000 unaccompanied minors that are housed there — we were denied access, despite the fact that last year I passed a law requiring the Office of Refugee Resettlement to allow members of Congress in, no questions asked, without any time limits, to conduct proper oversight to make sure children are being well-cared-for. So they continually flout the law. And the judicial branch continues to reject them.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/04/12/wasserman-schultz-on-trump-it-really-feels-more-like-we-have-a-comic-book-villain-in-the-white-house-than-a-president/

Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 6:49 a.m. No.6162502   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2523 >>2638

>>6162441

>Migrants break Guatemalan border gate, force their way into Mexico

 

I don't believe that bs!

The federales will shoot a mfer on sight when they really want to keep someone from crossing their border!

Those bastards don't play when they don't want someone entering Mexico, they don't enter, PERIOD!

Mexico is still playing games and using 'Muh dey broke my gate' as an excuse so POTUS doesn't get pissed off and put a tariff on the cars!

Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 7 a.m. No.6162560   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2564 >>2568 >>2570 >>2580

Illegal Alien Accused of Murdering Five Americans Found Dead in Jail Cell

A previously deported illegal alien who was charged with murdering five Americans in 2016 was found dead in his jail cell this week, Missouri officials announced.

As Breitbart News has chronicled, 40-year-old Pablo Serrano-Vitorino, an illegal alien from Mexico, was accused and charged with murdering five American men in March 2016. Serrano-Vitorino, prosecutors allege, had gone on a murder spree with a rifle across Kansas and Missouri, shooting and killing five men in total.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/12/illegal-alien-accused-of-murdering-five-americans-found-dead-in-jail-cell/

Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 7:03 a.m. No.6162583   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2596 >>2625 >>2671 >>2675 >>2681

Dershowitz: ‘No Constitutional Difference’ Between WikiLeaks And New York Times

In a column for The Hill, lawyer and legal scholar Alan Dershowitz argues that on the basis of current evidence, prosecuting WikiLeaks for the publication of Chelsea Manning’s leaks would not be constitutionally different to prosecuting The New York Times for publishing the Pentagon Papers in 1971.

Dershowitz writes:

 

If the New York Times, in 1971, could lawfully publish the Pentagon Papers knowing they included classified documents stolen by Rand Corporation military analyst Daniel Ellsberg from our federal government, then indeed WikiLeaks was entitled, under the First Amendment, to publish classified material that Assange knew was stolen by former United States Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning from our federal government.

 

Dershowitz, who has been a scathing critic of the Democrat efforts to impeach Trump over bogus “Russian collusion” allegations, said the current case against Assange is “factually weak.”

 

It is likely, therefore, that a prosecution of Assange for merely publishing classified material would fail. Moreover, Great Britain might be unwilling to extradite Assange for such a “political” crime. That is why prosecutors have chosen to charge him with a different crime of conspiracy to help Manning break into a federal government computer to steal classified material. Such a crime, if proven beyond a reasonable doubt, would have a far weaker claim to protection under the Constitution. The courts have indeed ruled that journalists may not break the law in an effort to obtain material whose disclosure would be protected by the First Amendment.

 

But the problem with the current effort is that, while it might be legally strong, it seems on the face of the indictment to be factually weak. It alleges that “Assange encouraged Manning to provide information and records” from federal government agencies, that “Manning provided Assange with part of a password,” and that “Assange requested more information.” It goes on to say that Assange was “trying to crack the password” but had “no luck so far.” Not the strongest set of facts here!

 

Dershowitz also questioned whether the case as it stands, built on what such shaky factual ground, would be sufficient for British legal authorities to grant an extradition request. Under U.K. law, those subject to extradition requests will have an opportunity to appeal the decision in U.K. courts.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/04/12/dershowitz-no-constitutional-difference-between-wikileaks-and-new-york-times/

Anonymous ID: 744048 April 13, 2019, 7:10 a.m. No.6162622   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2630

44 Pounds of Fentanyl Seized in San Diego County

https://www.breitbart.com/border/2019/04/12/44-pounds-of-fentanyl-seized-in-san-diego-county/

 

1,000 Pounds of Meth Seized by Mexican Authorities https://www.breitbart.com/border/2019/04/11/1000-pounds-of-meth-seized-by-mexican-authorities/