>>6212388 can we get better sourcing for this rather than just some random fucking YT channel
I don't think it was an accident, I just don't want this fucking post to be in a notable without better sourcing. The chief architect making the claim is a big deal imo but only if it's verifiable >>6213186
as if i know wtf that says. someone posted part of the transcript, the architect just said he was baffled. he didn't say THIS WAS NO ACCIDENT. just a click bate notable. do better, bakers