>6237009
>Would love to hear other anon's thoughts knowing what we know now about the original 2017 Q
Do you really think such retarded shit is gonna fly here?
You are either a very special kind of stupid or a very stupid kind of special.
Seems appropriate for that spoon.
Once again, Clowns trying to get in front of the narrative I would imagine.
>6237128
>This is a Q discussion board. If you don't want to discuss Q what the hell are you doing here faggot?
Wow, did you come up with this riposte yourself or is this from your supervisor?
Do you really expect intelligent anons to fall for the current Q is not original Q bullshit?
Did your supervisor forget to mention that Q already debunked that crap?
>https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/law-order-director-arrested-on-child-pornography-charges_n_55b969fbe4b0af35367a40cb
2015, anon?
We already knew this, not least because a recent article came out about why his wife was standing by him.
>I have been excited for no reason. Thanks
And that's why it's a good idea to read notables.