Anonymous ID: 8bcb9d April 19, 2019, 3:57 a.m. No.6237679   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7732 >>7769 >>7801

>>6236570 (lb)

 

>a45c1baf6d9fdca2eb8c892ba6154f26d6e3b0531391bc4a15748e48c09b3a0c

 

The code has multiple occurrences of 3 or more consecutive letters without numbers and numbers without letters.

 

Like fdca and 6154.

 

In chess, every square has one letter and one number, like D5.

 

To make it interpretable as a series of chess moves, we need a way to pair up letters with numbers.

 

There would also need to be just as many letters including 0 and 9 as there are numbers from 1 to 8 in the code.

 

But I count 30 occurrences of numbers between 1 and 8 and 34 occurrences of letters including 0 and 9 as letters.

 

It's 64 hexadecimal characters long, or 32 bytes, which is a 256-bit binary string.

 

That's a common size for an output of a hash algorithm such as SHA-256, which means that this could possibly be the hash of a file.

 

Publishing it is a threat or message to whoever else has the file (and can compute the 256-bit hash from it) that the file is in the possession of the person posting the hash.

Anonymous ID: 8bcb9d April 19, 2019, 4:40 a.m. No.6237835   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7856

>>6237811

 

You're right. It's the file name. Not necessarily the hash of the file itself. It's not SHA256 anyway. I'll try others.

 

Maybe there's a message in the filename, which is a possible hash, in which case the stringer is implying that it knows the message and is directing attention to it.

 

Or it's possible that the stringer is just pointing to the Q post about traitors and patriots.

Anonymous ID: 8bcb9d April 19, 2019, 4:57 a.m. No.6237903   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6237856

 

Yes! It's true.

 

It was sha256 after all, but the file I got from qposts.online was a lower resolution version. The version at qanon.pub gives the results you showed.

Anonymous ID: 8bcb9d April 19, 2019, 5:37 a.m. No.6238104   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6237970

 

I love this man's sense of humor. It's truly awesome.

 

Here's how I see it: Trump wrote the Mueller report.

 

Reason 1: The "I'm fucked, my presidency is over" part.

 

That's exactly the kind of story about stupid buffoonery that Trump leaks about himself knowing that his opponents will eat it up and underestimate him.

 

His public persona is part of his negotiating philosophy built up over years.

 

Other examples of Trump doing this are the "Gorilla Channel" story where Trump put out a hilarious story that he sat in front of the television shouting at gorillas to fight each other, and that his aides had to stitch together documentaries for him because there is no gorilla channel.

 

The other one was "John Miller", where Trump pretended to be his own agent and bragged about women who wanted to sleep with Trump. Trump was the only person with a copy of the tape that was leaked because the other person on the phone had no copy of it.

 

This part of the report is salacious gossip and has no relation to law enforcement or criminal investigation. It was inserted to feed the delusions of idiots in the media and the opposition.

 

Reason 2: "He tried to obstruct justice, but his subordinates disobeyed him."

 

That's a reprise of the part of Bob Woodwards book where he claims that Mattis disobeyed a direct order from the POTUS because, allegedly, Trump was making unwise decisions and Mattis had to be the adult and overrule him.

 

That's an absurd claim. US Marines don't overrule their commanding officers. It was something that was fed to Woodward from inside the White House. Guess who tells stories that make Trump look like an unstable buffoon?

 

Also, "tried but failed to obstruct justice" is not a valid reason to decline to indict somebody for obstructing justice. It is not required that the attempt to obstruct justice actually succeed. The attempt itself is the crime. Every person who is prosecuted for obstruction of justice failed to obstruct it.

 

So that makes no sense at all. It's fiction.