>>6239592 lb
eeeeeeeeew…
oh please no, not a "clever" let's-meld-modern-with-the-old because we say it's cool but really we're not good enough just to do like the old
>>6239592 lb
eeeeeeeeew…
oh please no, not a "clever" let's-meld-modern-with-the-old because we say it's cool but really we're not good enough just to do like the old
>seems rather
i just can't agree at all… every other recent building seems to do that, it's so trite.
sick to death of the copy-paste, lazy, contemporary oooh-let's-put-plenty-glass-in-there architecture.
sooooooooooo overdone.
Notre-Dame deserves so much better
>Seriously.
…yeah right
magariots shill expecting to be taken seriously.
whatajoke.
anons, would you hit him?