>>6251636 7994

Dana Boente…Chris Coons seems worried about the EDVA for some reason…(memory serves correct there was a dig on Chris Coons not to far back either)

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/08/senator-seeks-explanation-for-career-us-prosecutors-abrupt-resignation.html

U.S. Senator Chris Coons, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he was writing to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to ask if Boente’s departure was “normal or justified.”

“I’m concerned about the abrupt departure of Dana Boente after a career as a federal prosecutor … There’s a lot of circumstances that connect the ongoing Mueller investigation to the Eastern District,” Coons said in an interview.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/03/after-mueller-ongoing-investigations-trump/585376/

The United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia

Three unresolved cases are in this district. Kamil Ekim Alptekin, an associate of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, was indicted and charged for acting as an agent of the Turkish government and lying to the FBI. He has not appeared in court and, as far as we know, hasn’t been arrested; his case is unlikely to be resolved quickly for that reason. Another Flynn associate, Bijan Kian, is still awaiting trial for failing to register as a foreign agent after working on behalf of the Turkish government. Kian has pleaded not guilty.

Prosecutors have also indicted Elena Alekseevna Khusyaynova, the accountant for the Internet Research Agency, the Russian troll farm that authorities believe created fake social-media accounts to influence United States elections. She has been charged with crimes relating to interfering in both the 2016 presidential election and the 2018 midterm election. Though a warrant has been out for her arrest since last October, she isn’t in custody as far as we know, either.

a little on the turks being charged

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/12/michael-flynn-ex-associates-charged-turkey-lobby-case/578407/

>>6253023

http://911blogger.com/news/2007-12-01/wtc-architect-reveals-integral-demolition-charges

Laffoley continues: "Well, to put in demolition devices before you take occupancy. And that means, and the reason for that, is like what happens in Las Vegas. If the Bellagio hotel figures it can make a hundred more bucks by moving the hotel 3 feet to the right or the left, they'll tear it down and do it. You know, and so this was the same deal. Because I remember, you know, like in the 60s and the 70s, if you went to New York on any regular basis, and then you were away for a while, you come back, the same spot, there'd be a new building….If they were going to demolish it [a building in those days], they'd wrap it, and then they'd get all the dust…they'd come down like a set of pancakes. And that's the reason why World Trade Center building number seven went down, that wasn't hit. It's because those things were all connected to each other, so that they could just blow the whole thing up."

>>6253023

http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2007/04/bin-laden-construction-company-worked.html

Paul Laffoley appeared again on Mike Hagan's Radio Orbit show, this time to clarify the comments he made on Hagan's show on February 12, 2007, which caused a firestorm of controversy, and is what the full article below is based upon. Mike Hagan himself mentioned that the part of the new May 21, 2007 interview that is germane to this matter, runs from the 22:00 to 54:00 minute marks, which is the part of the discussion that pertains to his 9/11 bombshell revelations.

In this new interview, Paul Laffoley mentions that it is his belief that the explosive charges were built into the buildings at the time of their construction. The SMOKING GUN here is WTC 7 – which was obviously a controlled-demolition, and the Bin Laden family was definitely in on the construction of the WTC.

///

But, it really wasn't the FACT that BIN LADEN CONSTRUCTION worked on the project that was the real bombshell of what Laffoley had to say in this interview. The bombshell as it were, concerned the explosive charges that were built into the buildings AS PART OF THEIR DESIGN! Laffoley commented on how shocked he was when he was asked to think about HOW he would build in explosive charges, to take down the building complex, BEFORE it was even built!

Therefore, all those people who are trying to damage the cunning research of the 9/11 Truth Community (a community that does not rightly count Alex Jones among its' members, by the way!) by saying that they could have never slipped in those charges some time before 9/11, need to understand that those demolition charges that brought down WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 were there all along! Furthermore, it was Marvin Bush who played a big role in the security of the WTC complex, and between the Bush's, the Bin Laden's, Larry Silverstein, and the peculiar behavior of both Hillary Clinton and Rudolph Giuliani – we have all the major players in this up to their necks!

The reader might wonder WHY they might build-in explosive charges at the time the buildings are built. This is a natural thing about which to wonder. However, it is a FACT that the buildings in NYC are packed in tighter than sardines in the midst of their worst supermarket fate. So, it is axiomatic that the designers of these buildings (and their insurance companies) are looking for ways to bring down these buildings in a manner that will not endanger any of the surrounding and neighboring buildings.

Their answer is found within CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS, which most of us have seen via news footage of the implosions of old hotels and casinos in Las Vegas. Before 9/11, one could find television specials of these controlled demolitions on the HISTORY CHANNEL and other cable channels like them. Post-9/11, I cannot recall seeing one of these specials being aired, which I personally believe has been done to draw our attention AWAY from these ideas.

Now, WHY would they want to wire a building for a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, when it could be taken apart legally? Well, the owners of the WTC investigated this, and the cost would have been more than what the buildings were worth. In fact, the aspect of 9/11 that I have heard NO ONE else mention, is that it appears to be the single largest case of INSURANCE FRAUD that this country has ever seen!

interview here:22:00 to 54:00 minute marks

http://www.mikehagan.com/2012/mp3/021207_PAUL_LAFFOLEY.mp3

>>6253209

looks like it has been hit a plenty….

So how did the reporter get it before it was released?