Anonymous ID: 9e9c04 July 15, 2019, 10:57 a.m. No.7049977   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7047693

Here's the problem with this pic. The trees are casting shadows, the "fence" and its supports are not. Looks good from overhead but that is a cover. My two cents!

Anonymous ID: 9e9c04 July 18, 2019, 8:32 a.m. No.7081534   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1641

>>7047693

This "tennis court" is NOT throwing any shadows as I mentioned in the first reply. There are NO consistencies in shadows from the trees vs the tennis court, look closer. Shadows from the trees are to the right side of them, no corresponding shadows coming from the tennis court posts, netting or lights. These overhead covers have been used for decades (old school deception used by us and the Russians, etc) to fool satellites. Also if you dig a little bit you will see where this cover was put back into place but had a wrinkle that caused the lines at one end of the court to be completely distorted. Not trying to be an asshole just pointing out a few things I learned after two and a half decades wearing the uniform and looking at more overhead imagery than I can count. Cheers anons!

Anonymous ID: 9e9c04 July 23, 2019, 7:34 p.m. No.7154882   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8516

>>7095594

Perhaps. I don't see a windsock or any other ILS. Can't imagine they would want to land and be that visible during the daytime if they were ferrying kids. Flying VFR and have latest milspec NVG and thermal is a high probability. My two cents.