>>6445253 (pb)
pretty blatant use of terminology within metaphors…
a little too obvious?
enjoying the show.
Have always thought that…
Logic…if people are allowing poll tally portrayal on "news" to influence decission in confidence and thereby swinging influential power towards electoral vote tally by poll narrative, their minds were essentially made up well before the poll was laid out and displayed.
Although I am not techieanon, I can see clearly the capacity for the current communications system having the ability to utilize fake accounts and fake people for influence, and can see all evidence pointing to exactly that when I look with an unbiased eye at the open source data and stats on any given platform. I have my pepe friends to thank for better observational skills over the years, but the fact has always been the influence has been fake…even before the internet….dead people were caught voting ffs.
So, in essence, why wouldn't the more appropriate route towards a poll that is blatantly only there to influence rather than actually gain statistics to help keep We The People with the power we are supposed to have not aimed solely at capturing the bots activity, documenting the activity in real time, displaying the activity in the open with verifyable proof that the accounts are fake and at the utilization of the pollcaster due to purchase? I only ask because although I am still a shitty digger, my imaginative intuition tells me following the money in this instance would yeild quite more than even my imagination could foresee.
I'm not calling anons out for not utilizing their skills, but I am saying there are anons with massive kung-fu resources whom can make this shit happen.
Besides, influencing a poll later found to be responsible for decissions made can be hazardous both ways….
Just some thoughts. Of course the game is rigged and unfair, and at times the gloves come off regardless…..
without proper understanding, hard for this anon to tell, but I am sensing POTUS twatter is speaking morse with RT's and regular tweets.
Not an original thought, I am sure it has been in here before, just saying what I see right this moment.
Better rule…
No "public servants or offices" and the responsibilities are laid out and shared by revolving citizens each with a period of duty necessary in ALL offices.
You don't really think it will EVER go back to the fake R & D bullshit movie, do you? I am quite sure our own military will sink this fucking ship before it ever sees it in the hands of an enemy again….your call though. Don't forget who makes up the military.