Anonymous ID: 180494 May 9, 2019, 6:34 a.m. No.6453923   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3972 >>3980 >>3996 >>4012 >>4039 >>4165 >>4465 >>4634 >>4670

No Senate Intelligence Committee Republicans Publicly Stand Up for Richard Burr’s Rogue Donald Trump Jr. Subpoena

 

What the heck is Sen. Richard Burr's deal? He hardly seems to fit the template of your typical backstabbing RINO.

 

Even if the Trump Jr. subpoena is some kind of trap being set, it's hard to see how the optics would work out favorably as a result of "bipartisan support" for this nonsense. I'm guessing the cabal must have some kind of leverage over him.

 

 

Not one GOP senator on the Senate Intelligence Committee was willing to publicly align himself or herself on Wednesday evening with the panel’s chairman, Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), after Burr made the determination, against indications from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, to issue a subpoena to Donald Trump Jr. to testify again on the Russia probe.

News broke late Wednesday afternoon that Burr had issued Trump, Jr. a subpoena to try to compel the president’s eldest son to testify again. The subpoena is in contravention of a previous promise Burr made to Trump, Jr. that he would only need to testify once and would not be subpoenaed, and it contradicts McConnell’s edict on Tuesday that the Russia hoax is “case closed” after two years of investigating with no evidence of collusion or obstruction.

 

Condemnation rained down upon Burr quickly and swiftly from across the Republican Party, as Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy both ripped him for the subpoena, as did Reps. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) and Devin Nunes (R-CA), the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, who served as chair for the first two years of Trump’s presidency, as well as many others in the Trump universe.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/08/no-senate-intelligence-committee-republicans-publicly-stand-up-for-richard-burrs-rogue-donald-trump-jr-subpoena/

Anonymous ID: 180494 May 9, 2019, 8:01 a.m. No.6454305   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6454039

I don't know… reading about his background, he doesn't really fit the profile. He's reliably conservative on most issues, and there's not much evidence of him having been a "never Trumper" in the past.