Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 6:52 a.m. No.6453983   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4027

>>6453935 lb

you funny dickweed. Love how some of you decide that you know moar than anyone else.

Kind of a problem is this country. Also loved the late reply so you "get" the last word in…coward.

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 7:08 a.m. No.6454033   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4165 >>4465 >>4670

OPEC in the dark on oil supply as Russia, Iran cut exports

 

DUBAI/LONDON (Reuters) - OPEC is in the dark on the oil supply outlook for the second half of this year, with Iranian and Russian outages looking increasingly significant but Saudi Arabia reluctant to pump more due to fears of a price crash, sources in the organization said.

An oil contamination forced Russia to halt flows along the Druzhba pipeline, a key conduit for crude into Eastern Europe and Germany, in April. The suspension left refiners scrambling to find supplies and its duration is unclear.

 

Iran’s oil exports are likely to drop further in May as the United States tightens the screw on Tehran’s main source of income. Shipments from Venezuela, also under U.S. sanctions, could fall more in coming weeks.

 

The dearth of information is a headache for OPEC and allies led by Russia, which gather in June to decide whether to renew a supply-cutting deal. A panel of ministers meets on May 19 in Saudi Arabia to discuss the market and make recommendations.

 

Two delegates from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries said the Russian outage, on top of Iranian and Venezuelan export losses, would be discussed at the Jeddah meeting and it seemed more than a short-term technical glitch.

 

“It’s potentially significant,” one of the delegates said of the pipeline halt.

 

Still, the delegate added, the price of Brent crude - close to $70 a barrel, down from a 2019 high of $75.60 last month - suggested traders saw no major risk of any shortage.

 

Other OPEC sources said there were conflicting views on the significance of the Russian outage, and that the complexity of Russia’s pipeline system meant the issue was not straightforward.

 

“I’m not quite seeing the impact in terms of supply shortage,” another OPEC delegate said.

SUPPLY DROP

 

Analysts at Citigroup saw the Russian export loss as enough to affect the balance between supply and demand.

 

“While it is still difficult to assess the final impacts on balances, the severity of the problem could mean up to 400,000 bpd (barrels per day) of Russian exports could be pulled out of the market for longer than earlier anticipated,” they wrote.

 

That would further tighten the market, with OPEC signaling even before the Druzhba outage that demand would exceed supply by more than 800,000 bpd in the third quarter.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-oil-opec/opec-in-the-dark-on-oil-supply-as-russia-iran-cut-exports-idUSKCN1SF1LV?il=0

and nothing to do with the $12b in bond's shoved out the door for aramco either

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 7:12 a.m. No.6454046   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4061

>>6454027

and yet you attacked the other anon with your "superior" knowledge and projection of who is this or that.

>Gave you a couple links from your own sauce.

 

you don't even realize that I'm not the original post you went after. Try running an id before you become high and mighty.

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 7:20 a.m. No.6454073   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Hershey Trust selling Moar share's

 

Latest is cap #1-recent's are 2,3.

https://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/47111.htm

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 7:24 a.m. No.6454093   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4109 >>4174

>>6454061

Pondering your statement of who is powerful and who is not? Newsflash buddy…none of us would be here if your statement about POTUS rang true.

You're just too funny trying to re-explain your original "position". Now go away as work to do.

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 7:40 a.m. No.6454191   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6454174

>>ALL powerful but he isn't.

Not in my post, so where you got that from-most likely up your own ass-and who is implying now?

>>see you next night shift

with bell's on asshole

you replied to same post twice……..

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 8:01 a.m. No.6454304   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dow Drops Over 1000 Points From Highs As Yield Curve Inverts

 

Update: The Dow is down over 1100 points from its highs in April.

(again this is the system lashing out at POTUS for the china deal to be done-it's not his fault it has gone on this long-he will get it done but it may take moar time)

For the first time since Jan 23rd, the S&P 500 has broken back below its key 50-day moving-average to six-week lows as trade deal anxiety takes hold.

Finally, those wondering where are the next selling-wave triggers, here are McElligott's observations on what will catalyze even more selling:

 

S&P 500, 100.0% long into today but ‘spot’ is currently through the sell-trigger level (note: needs to HOLD & CLOSE below), selling under 2894.82 to get to 60% as both the 2w and 1m signals “flip” to SELL, more selling under 2642.11 to get to -100%, flip to short under 2642.41, max short under 2642.11

 

NASDAQ 100, 100.0% long into today, selling under 7597.86 (to get to 60%, more selling under 6699.38 to get to -100%, flip to short under 6700.16, max short under 6699.38

 

Russell 2000, 100.0% long into today but "spot" is currently through the sell-trigger level (note: needs to HOLD & CLOSE below), selling under 1584.44 to get to 60%, more selling under 1579.99 to get to -100%, flip to short under 1580.15, max short under 1579.99

 

And the biggest irony: after defying the rally for so long, it was only in the past few days that asset managers finally threw in the towel, and rush to get equity exposure. And, as so often happens, that's precisely when the trapdoor opened.

nd while the equity world is derisking, safe-haven flows are rushing into Treasuries.

(this will give the yield curve a bit of room-gee weren't we just talking about this?)

If the market's were up bigly then the curve would be negative by a bigger margin-they are fucked.

So much for yesterday's terrible auction.

 

And the yield curve has pushed back into inversion once again.

See cap #2

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-09/sp-500-tumbles-through-key-technical-support

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 8:41 a.m. No.6454536   🗄️.is 🔗kun

6265f3 (4)

anon who asked about EL panel . I use the mountaintop charts(in here) as they are basic and show non-financially inclined anon's, and not suggesting you are, what they need to see. I do not use those for gathering and doing analysis

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 8:55 a.m. No.6454642   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4654

'Dis getting shedded

 

Shares of Stamps.com cut in half after company slashes earnings forecast

 

Stamps.com stock dropped as much as 52% in trading Thursday after the company slashed its 2019 earnings forecast, as well as projected further declines in 2020 and 2021.

 

The postage company announced on its first quarter conference call that it expects to take a hit due to uncertain contract changes that its partner companies have with the United States Postal Service. The hit comes after Stamps.com said in the previous quarter that it will no longer partner with USPS.

 

Shares of Stamps.com had already fallen 46.4% this year as of Wednesday's close of $83.39 a share. The stock's market value was $1.45 billion on Wednesday.

 

A postal customer drops letters into a slot at a post office May 11, 2009 in San Francisco, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

A postal customer drops letters into a slot at a post office May 11, 2009 in San Francisco, California.

 

Stamps.com stock dropped as much as 52% in trading Thursday after the company slashed its 2019 earnings forecast, as well as projected further declines in 2020 and 2021.

 

The postage company announced on its first quarter conference call that it expects to take a hit due to uncertain contract changes that its partner companies have with the United States Postal Service. The hit comes after Stamps.com said in the previous quarter that it will no longer partner with USPS.

 

Shares of Stamps.com had already fallen 46.4% this year as of Wednesday's close of $83.39 a share. The stock's market value was $1.45 billion on Wednesday.

 

"We have very recently become aware that the USPS is currently renegotiating the negotiated service agreements of several of our reseller partners," Stamps.com CFO Jeff Carberry told shareholders on the call. "While these are ongoing negotiations with uncertain outcomes and we have limited visibility given that the negotiations are being conducted between the USPS and our reseller integration partners, we believe it is reasonably possible that the margins associated and earned by the resellers as a result of these negotiations will begin to decrease around the second half of 2019."

 

Stamps.com issued a 2019 earnings guidance within a range of $3.35 a share to $4.85 a share, a 35% cut on the bottom end of the range from its previous guidance.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/09/stampscom-shares-crater-after-slashed-forecast-on-fallout-from-postal-service-deal.html

 

Stamps.com Inc. (STMP)

-45.35 (-54.38%)

Volume 9,660,677

Avg. Volume 1,168,054

Anonymous ID: 2bc049 May 9, 2019, 9:03 a.m. No.6454712   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4735

>>6454654

put it in and not really notable, and ty for nom-if baker did that then it could fill the bun on certain day's. Was here for posterity. Has a jpeg too, self-derp.

just put it in towards end as a whim