1. Johnny was a cool and popular motherfucker. He was just trying to have a good time and blaze a doobie at the Halloween party. But (((Daniel son))) just couldn't help himself… He drenched Johnny with water for no reason, and even worse, he ruined what might have been a very nice smoking session and even an enlightening moment for Johnny.

1. After ruin Johnny's time at the Halloween party, (((Daniel son))) causes a multi-car pile up, while running from the mischief he had just caused, dressed as a shower curtain (an extremely gay-costume compared to Johnny & Co's skeleton costumes which were cool AF).

1. Johnny & Co catch up the instigative, mischief causing, (((Daniel son))). This is easily achieved, as the Jew is typically a physically weak creature that is easily run down by pursuers. They catch him as he is attempting to trespass on private property, breaking yet another law.

1. Knowing that law enforcement would likely fuck up any investigation into the matter, Johnny decides to administer an appropriate level of street justice. One of Johnny's friends proves to be a total bitch, when he starts crying for Johnny to stop after Johnny had only hit (((Daniel son))) 4 times (twice to the solar-plexus, and once to each side of his face).

1. (((Daniel son))) was still conscious, not bleeding, and simply being a dramatic little faggot, because that's what (((they))) do. If he didn't want to fight, he shouldn't have started a fight, for the second time (the first time being on the beach).

***It should be noted, that following this incident, a foreign invader trained in combat, attacked and injured these 5 high school boys and was never charged with a crime. (Creese should have beat his ass).

New York STATE Police, or some other appropriate form of Law enforcement should look into Detective Jack Graham's handling of a case on 03/10/2017.

A call was placed to 911, the CPS 1-800 #, as well as, local CPS by the original complainant, whom was the father.

Det. Graham, called the alleged abuser, the mother, on the phone. Shortly, after this the mother called CPS to make a very similar claim.

CW Allison Janecki, of CPS reported in her progress notes, that Det. Graham, the alleged abuser, and the child arrived at the hospital together. She reported that Det Graham allowed the alleged abuser not only to be in the room while a forensic interview was conducted on the child, but she was directed to ask the child these questions, at approx. 10:00 pm, as the child was half-asleep in the alleged abuser's arms.

Furthermore, there are conflicting reports as to how the child responded… "laughed and said no"… "Shook her head no, but gave no verbal response"… "Squeeled no, and said no"… Which is it?

The child again disclosed to her father that she was abused in the mother's household, this time by the mother's new husband, on Nov. 7th of 2017. The father reported what his daughter had disclosed too the proper authorities. Initially CPS checked on the wrong child. No one got back to the father for 6 days. The father was forced to return his child to the alleged abuser's home, per court orders of their visitation, which Jeffrey Mann of CPS stated he could not interfere with in any way. But said, he would see what he could do…

A forensic interview was not conducted on the child until 24 days later. Furthermore, Jeffrey Mann testified in a court of law just yesterday, 05/08/2019, that law enforcement "told him to ignore [the father]".

Meanwhile, the father was incessantly calling everyone he could in law enforcement for help, and getting no relief. Even going so far as to contact the FBI. The father became frustrated with being ignored and began a series of posts on Facebook expressing his concern and disapproval of how a series of investigations of abuse of his child had been handled. This is confirmed in the progress noted of Det. Emily Nelson-Gerken.

However, the father only very recently became aware of such details as how Det. Graham conducted his investigation on 03/10/2017, as well as many others. The father has sufficient documentation to support his very recent concern that his attorney, as well as the attorney for the child (AFC), may have been negligent in their duties and did not properly present all the facts to the court, whether intentionally or by mistake, and that this among other factors such as the improper handling of these investigations, has caused great damage to both himself and his daughter.

This father, who has reported numerous instances of abuse of his child to the courts, the attorney for the child, and law enforcement, and whose allegations are supported by at least 4 other witnesses, was then accused of making false allegations, his child was taken from him, and he is currently being legally-abused in the Erie County Family Courts.

He still maintains his innocence. His child is still in the hands and household of the alleged abusers… who were NEVER properly investigated.

>>6454584

He has that right.