I re-looked at the essay and realized it's good.
I'm glad everyone liked it.
My critique was a quibble?.
But truly, It's confusing to claim "Q" team are in control of the suspects tweets, without evidence.
When the "Q team" writes "Threat to controlled narrative"
Who / Which are the "controlled narrative" ?
Could that refer to Q team controlling the traitor's narrative?
No, I'm not that far down the rabbit hole; especially without evidence.
If I'm wrong, just show me what you've got.
Does it disappear when you try to find it, a mirage?
It is imaginary?
Would "controlled narrative" refer to the MSM?
And what it is they try to force everyone to believe?
"Mind Control?'
And is the "Q team" 's / anon combination's research, commentary, collection of data, logic, charts, hashing it out —- starting to break up the mind control?
Light destroys Dark. Just the way it is.
My interpretation is the most simple;
"Qteam" anons and researchers are a threat to their controlled narrative.
Doesn't "Q team" repeat that?
>>6454454 pb
>>6454593 pb
It's possible. But not necessary to explain what's going on.
Do you have evidence for that?
Even if it is true that "Q team" is in charge of tweets, I'm unconvinced that Q team's composing of the tweets would wake people up any more than would the actual tweets of the real perps.
Why would it matter?
Could anons be assuming the tweets of the Trump-haters are written by "Q Team" because they just seem so stupid and some anons can't imagine the criminals could be so dumb for so long and still have had the massive power they have commanded?
Study psychopaths and you'll find out they do really stupid things. They are handicapped, though appearing normal.