>>6456315 One man's opinion: Sorcha was completely unreliable for a long time, 75% BS mixed in with 25% truth. Anyone who paid any rational attention at all knew this was true.

But around the time Q began to post, Sorcha changed. It became more like 50-50 truth/BS, then evolved to 75% accuracy, and now IMO it is 80-85% truth. Am thinking that they were co-opted by our people, and now present our side of the story nearly straight up. They should stop presenting each piece though, with statements like, "A stunning report circulating, blah blah blah." And discernment should of course always be utilized with any source. Even if they are co-opted, our side of necessity also slips in disinfo. FWIW