>obviously POTUS is not tweeting himself
what the fuck are you talking about?
Each of the examples you just showed are threads, including what you're shilling for today
Twitter threads show the same time for each tweet in the thread.
Stop trying to discredit deltas you fucking shill.
kys rainmain, fuck off already
that too, kek
POTUS Twitter Threads Are Not [0] Deltas
>a thread / split up tweets with delta 10 mins.
That's not a thread you stupid fuck, that's just two tweet and IS a [10] delta.
This graphic explains that THREADS do not have deltas and are NOT [0] deltas.
This graphics also shows that deltas are between TWO TWEETS, not threads.
You're actually so stupid it's hilarious.
Go back to posting copypasta and shilling for famefags, paytriots, muh clock, and calling everyone masons you petulant shill.
self nomination of course, but consider this:
>>6488463, >>6488317 POTUS Twitter Threads Are Not [0] Deltas
rainmain/megashill is at it again spreading disinfo for deltas (imo to boost the "Qclock" because he shills for them too)
>Go back to posting copypasta and shilling for famefags, paytriots, muh clock, and calling everyone masons you petulant shill.
AND HE DID, KEK
so consider that.
A thread is a legitimate function of twitter
Two related tweets are NOT threads you stupid foreigner shill. Threads are SHOWN AS THREADS and have NO DELTA AND ARE NO [0] DELTAS, two tweets are just two fucking tweets and have a delta you fucking idiot.
btfo and kys.
Goddamnit you're a fucking dumbass.
Thanks BO.
Again, seriously dude, see: >>6488463
Two tweets that are related are not a legitimate twitter thread that makes all the tweets at the same time AUTOMATICALLY.
Threads are NOT [0] deltas, two tweets that are NOT threads HAVE deltas.
Are you really this dumb?
Fucking incredible, I'm actually trying to inform you, but you're lost.
hey clocknigger, ready for a btfo?