If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Q drop #2118
Ask yourself this: on what known facts could either of these if-then statements be absolutely true? If your answer is "well, gee, brah, there ain't any such evidence…"
You get a cookie. Disinformation IS necessary. Everyone is watching this board.
Correct. And it's a subset of the basic if-then logic statement.
And the statements also have no known factual basis in which to be presumed true, and therefore, if taken as true, they are misleading.
Philosophy is pretty neat when you actually think about it…
Not at all. I understood what you said very well (turns out, I am a lawyer).
I also know that the way to bust up a theoretical statement is to yank the rug out from underneath it when it doesn't have evidence.
The premise set forth in the exclusive nor is not based on any known facts which indicate that it would be operative. Therefore, it's misleading (unknown to be true, but not necessarily false).
That's called disinformation. (Turns out I also do intel).
Either that, or I'm not clinging to any such theory and am continuing the use of the disinformation for the purpose it was intended.
Are you sew confused yet?