>>6492824 PB
^^^^^^^
This. This is what I was trying to say.
Disinfo is necessary so, basically everything that Q says requires logic. It cannot just be taken at face value.
>>6492824 PB
^^^^^^^
This. This is what I was trying to say.
Disinfo is necessary so, basically everything that Q says requires logic. It cannot just be taken at face value.
No, that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that we still don't know if they are both clean bc that post # 2118 could have been disinfo.
One being clean does not make the other clean except that's what Q told us.
I was hoping all along that Mueller is clean or at least playing for our side in order to redeem himself.
But right now, I am not going to make that assumption.
You can if you want to.
We're these people forced to sacrafice their children?
Warned to do this or else we kill your kid?
Basically a lose/lose situation.
There is footage that I've seen of a press conference where the astronauts are asked why the sky behind them is completely black with no stars.
They hemmed and hawed and brushed off the question without really answering it.
That's what got me thinking that there might really be some truth to the fake moon landing conspiracy.