Anonymous ID: cb1769 May 15, 2019, 1:10 p.m. No.6506874   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6926

>>6506848

Here's our supposed proof of "Atomic bombs".

<in fact, one of the pictures is of firebombed Tokyo, can YOU tell which?

>The explosion of atom bombs over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 resulted in very high casualties, both immediate and delayed but also left a large number of survivors who had been exposed to radiation, at levels that could be fairly precisely ascertained. Extensive follow-up of a large cohort of survivors (120,000) and of their offspring (77,000) was initiated in 1947 and continues to this day. In essence, survivors having received 1 Gy irradiation (∼1000 mSV) have a significantly elevated rate of cancer (42% increase) but a limited decrease of longevity (∼1 year), while their offspring show no increased frequency of abnormalities and, so far, no detectable elevation of the mutation rate.

 

> no detectable elevation of the mutation rate.

 

BECAUSE GASOLINE AND INCENDIARY & HIGH EXPLOSIVE BOMBS DON'T CAUSE MUTATIONS

 

https://www.genetics.org/content/203/4/1505

Anonymous ID: cb1769 May 15, 2019, 1:26 p.m. No.6506983   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6996

>>6506954

>https://www.genetics.org/content/203/4/1505

The explosion of atom bombs over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 resulted in very high casualties, both immediate and delayed but also left a large number of survivors who had been exposed to radiation, at levels that could be fairly precisely ascertained. Extensive follow-up of a large cohort of survivors (120,000) and of their offspring (77,000) was initiated in 1947 and continues to this day. In essence, survivors having received 1 Gy irradiation (∼1000 mSV) have a significantly elevated rate of cancer (42% increase) but a limited decrease of longevity (∼1 year), while their offspring show no increased frequency of abnormalities and, so far, no detectable elevation of the mutation rate.

 

"only a limited decrease of longevity (∼1 year), while their offspring show no increased frequency of abnormalities and, so far, no detectable elevation of the mutation rate."

Anonymous ID: cb1769 May 15, 2019, 1:28 p.m. No.6506996   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7008

>>6506983

Trinity Test

Prior to the first "atomic" test, a bomb composed of 100-tons of TNT was detonated.

It created a crater 5 ft deep x 30' wide.

Then the Trinity Test, supposed first detonation of world's first nuclear bomb.

Prior to the first "atomic" test, a bomb composed of 100-tons of TNT was detonated.

It created a crater 5 ft deep x 30' wide.

But it was 20,000 times more powerful than the TNT test????

Anonymous ID: cb1769 May 15, 2019, 1:33 p.m. No.6507033   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7051 >>7143

>>6507008

Born Secret

Did you know that the science behind how an uncontrolled nuclear fission reaction creates a 'nuclear' explosion is completely 'classified'? Not talking about how to build a bomb. I'm talking about the actual physics of the atoms.

Someone could get a PhD in nuclear sciences and work their whole life as a nuclear physicist, but they still can't explain how 'nuclear' explosions are possible

Anonymous ID: cb1769 May 15, 2019, 1:36 p.m. No.6507051   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7064 >>7143

>>6507033

In this photo, we can see on the right how that might look like a 'mushroom cloud' from a nuclear explosion.

But the original photo on the left clearly shows that fire are burning and billowing into the air.

Someone doctored the photo on the right to make it appear as tho a nuke went off

Anonymous ID: cb1769 May 15, 2019, 1:44 p.m. No.6507125   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7136

>>6507103

Why fake it?

They certain originally thought they could build 'the bomb'

But it didn't work.

It may in fact be physically impossible.

It was a 'theory' after all when they started the manhattan project.

Why might they decide to go ahead and make it look like they were successful?

Japanese surrender, Soviet halts advance in Europe. WWII officially ends. No one fucks with America again. Etc.

Anonymous ID: cb1769 May 15, 2019, 2:42 p.m. No.6507621   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7665

>>6507077

>Don't take my word for it.

>Read about the Nuclear Weapons Hoax here: >>6507077

About the Author

Akio Nakatani is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. His

research interests include Stochastic Systems, Parameter Estimation, Stochastic

Optimization, Monte Carlo Methods and Simulation, Neural Networks,

Statistical Pattern Recognition, Statistical Image Analysis, Nonparametric Bayes

and Bayesian Hierarchical Models, Time Series, Graphical Models,

Nonparametric Bayes and Bayesian Hierarchical Models.