Tanks Bakes
WHo the hell is this load?
What kinda Freudian slip is a grouping of letters that make the sound "repetitional". He may have meant reputational, but I'm not going to just give it to him. It's not a difficult nor obscure word. Seems to me he made up that word, because he doesn't actually know the real word.
After allthe shit the Gov of Albany has been pulling lately, there's really not region in want to associate closely with Albany.
>It could spell the end of credit-card rewards
>It could lead to an increase in the fees charged to card holders
>It could reduce access to credit for low-income consumers
What's the downside here.
-
CC Rewards? Those are part of the marketing campaign. Interest rates don't effect them. There judge on the effectiveness of the draw and brand loyalty.
-
So what if fees and membership payments exist now. The majority do not charge them. Not because of interest rates, but competition. The most lucrative market segments for CC loath fees for CC. The CC co's can't just willy nilly charge fees, let alone raise them. The most ambiguous and abusive rules automatically adjust costomer interest rates higher for the silliest of reasons, and send vague legalese letters that suggest the letter is a mundane legal requirement, then states your interest may change. They also say that the rates could be lower or higher if they change at all. This is where more fuckery will accur if the legislation passes.
-
Credit is a curse to the poorest people. The interest rates are criminal. Rather than building credit, these people wander in and out of credit defaults. Their lenders are profiting from it. These unethical loans are the modern version of a Loan Shark. Only loan sharks drew the line at 50% interest. And they risked federal and state prosecution.
In the end, these are obviously just shill-lobbyist talking points, employed by the CC industry. The skillfuil avoidance of interest rate/penalties points in that direction. Don't want folks talking about it.
>t wouldn't be getting taken down virtually no matter where we post it. it got pruned over and over on half.
Well yes it would. It is critical of well placed wealthy people, causing much distress for wealhy social climbers. The inherent abundance of spoopyness that has been saucelessly claimed, is neither a necessary or sufficient condition for his enemies reactions. There is an entire industry that aides these fucks when scandals pop up.
Long story short, your claim that the efforts to bury the story lend no support to Kappy's claims. Benefit of a doubt should be carefully extended when one is dealing with a complete nutter.
Damn anon is too stoned. It just seemed too odd, like quickerer.
What I get for taking an unverified pot shot at real anons.
Yep Fucked up hard. Sorry anons.