Anonymous ID: ede651 May 18, 2019, 2:37 p.m. No.6530770   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0836

Strzok - seems to pop us in so many places. Nothing to see here…

 

So the same FBI investigator who led the Hillary Clinton email investigation –

– The same individual who led the Hillary interview and neglected to take notes, put her under oath or record the meeting

– The same individual who assisted in drafting the memo months before the Hillary was interviewed that was presented by corrupt FBI Director Comey to explain why the FBI was not pressing charges against Hillary

– The same individual who lead the Russia – Trump investigation

– The same individual who neglected to do anything when presented with information that China was hacking Hillary’s emails real-time

– The same individual who personally reviewed over 300,000 Hillary emails found on perp Anthony Weiner’s computer a week before the 2016 election

– The same individual that said all of Weiner’s emails were reviewed in less than a week and no criminally related information was found

– This individual, Peter Strzok, went to the White House a couple days after President Trump’s inauguration and entrapped General Flynn, President Trump’s National Security Advisor, in discussions related to Russia.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/must-read-muellers-reprehensible-ultimatum-to-general-flynn-your-son-or-your-country-make-your-decision/

Anonymous ID: ede651 May 18, 2019, 2:51 p.m. No.6530838   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0845 >>0848 >>0853 >>0861

Can anyone confirm that it is true that super spy James Bond wannabe Peter Strzok failed his polygraph test?

 

I know poly tests are not completely indicative of lying, but this is interesting if true.

 

"Validating Paul Sperry’s tweet. Yes, FBI Agent Peter Strzok failed his polygraph and his supervisors were notified on January 16th, 2016, his results were “out of scope“. Meaning he failed his polygraph test. Yet he was never removed from any responsibilities; and against dept policy, he did not have his clearance revoked until he could clear."

 

"After Strzok was recently removed from official responsibility within the FBI, his security clearances were retroactively revoked. That revocation was due to OPR review and was a retroactive revocation action initiated by career officials within the FBI to cover-up (ie. CYA) the two-and-a-half years he was allowed to work when he should not have been.

 

Current FBI officials, including Trump appointed FBI Director Christopher Wray, are covering up the scandal within the FBI in a misguided effort to save the institution.

 

This is the same reason the FBI hid the Strzok/Page memos and emails away from IG review and congressional oversight.

 

There is a massive, ongoing, ‘institutional’ cover-up within the DOJ and FBI. These are simply examples highlighting the severity therein. Peter Strzok and his legal team are counting on the need for the institution to be protected as their shield from any prosecution.

 

As long as AG Jeff Sessions, DAG Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Chris Wray and Deputy Director David Bowditch put the institution ahead of the need for accountability, there will be no repercussions against the former DOJ and FBI officials for unlawful conduct."

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/06/yes-its-true-peter-strzok-failed-his-polygraph-yet-retained-security-clearance-and-position-on-two-investigations/

Anonymous ID: ede651 May 18, 2019, 2:55 p.m. No.6530859   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6530848

>They didn't term it "fail" but he didn't pass.

 

>So was to be re-called to re-do.

 

I am curious as to which questions tripped him up.

 

For example - "have you ever lied knowingly about an ongoing investigation?" or "have you ever knowingly entered false information into an investigation?"