Heh, I knew you'd be here.
Having her killed because she was sleeping with a saracen makes a little more sense than cloning.
Julian Assange has it.
>They're all compromised.
This. You need discernment and this only comes from knowledge and life experience. I'd bet most people here right now are 50+.
Then why wasn't Fergie killed too? She left the royals.
Also, is RICHARD Spencer any relation?
Noticed there was flooding in Little Rock yesterday.
The drugs came into Mena and were shipped evywhere using Wal-Mart trucks. Yes, the Clintons are Gulf Cartel.
(Others are with Jailso New Generation or Sinaloa or what's left of the Zetas, lots of coke in politics, ask McConnell.)
Anon, stay far, far away from dentists and dental hygienists especially. Very dangerous people.
>Won't someone rid me of that meddling priest?
Plausible deniability. Masonic initialism code is used a lot on here as well.
The orthodox guys who like their version of monks are okay. These are the guys in the black suits and hats.
The others that pretend to be other ethnic groups and promote dysgenics are the ones he's referring to.
>purely psychological warfare
Well I've been online since 1987 and have seen every type of flame known to man. They're not doing a good job.
Cocaine is why I switched careers. Asshole powder was too common in law offices. Never tried it, heart condition.
I also heard a story that they've kept HRC coked out since 1978 because otherwise she's unbearable. She must have burned out her septum by now.
They're called 'flanker/fighter brands" BTW.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighter_Brand
Use of a fighter brand is one of the oldest strategies in branding, tracing its history to cigarette marketing in the 19th century. The strategy is most often used in difficult economic times.[2] As customers trade down to lower-priced offers because of economic constraints, many managers at mid-tier and premium brands are faced with a classic strategic conundrum: Should they tackle the threat head-on and reduce existing prices, knowing it will reduce profits and potentially commodify the brand? Or should they maintain prices, hope for better times to return, and in the meantime lose customers who might never come back? With both alternatives often equally unpalatable, many companies choose the third option of launching a fighter brand.
When the strategy works, a fighter brand not only defeats a low-priced competitor, but also opens up a new market. The Celeron microprocessor is a case study of a successful fighter brand. Despite the success of its Pentium processors, Intel faced a major threat from less costly processors that were better placed to serve the emerging market for low-cost personal computers, such as the AMD K6. Intel wanted to protect the brand equity and price premium of its Pentium chips, but also wanted to avoid AMD gaining a foothold into the lower end of the market. This led to Intel's creation of the Celeron brand, a cheaper, less powerful version of Intel's Pentium chips, as a fighter brand to serve this market.
All cellphones use one of the four major networks:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_mobile_virtual_network_operators
>investigated for anti-semitism
To me that comes off as "and he has unpaid parking tickets!"
They really lost the branding war. Someone who complains constantly is eventually ignored, and if they then disrupt for attention, they're despised as well.
A lot of shills are timesucks, that is, they take people off research and down rabbit holes (the masons here love posting those). I've gotten to the point where if the first line of a post is a shill-like question, I filter them. Not much I have missed, and if I do make a mistake, there's always notables if others think it's important.
ZANU-PF?
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2019-06-04-farewell-to-zimbabwes-black-russian-dumisa-dabengwa/
>6668011
My professional opinion based on the syntax.