Anonymous ID: e43a06 June 3, 2019, 10:07 p.m. No.6667354   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7360 >>7366 >>7371 >>7374 >>7661

>>6667249

>>6667264

>>6667252

nearly 24/7 operation - indicating more than 1 person and the team doing shift duty. Occasional lapses in posting shit content most likely correlated with lunch breaks or shit breaks.

 

You guys are on the wrong side of history and on the wrong side of this war. Either grow a pair, unfuck yourself and start fighting for good or resign yourself to your crap fates.

Anonymous ID: e43a06 June 3, 2019, 10:27 p.m. No.6667454   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7464

>>6667428

In late 1962 the Earth was subjected to a gigantic experiment. Retired NASA Astronaut Phil Chapman writes [1]:

 

Between August 2 and Christmas in 1962, just before the atmospheric test ban went into effect, the Soviet Union detonated no fewer than 36 nuclear weapons at their test site on Novaya Zemlya in the high Arctic, with an incredible total yield of 141.5 megatons of TNT equivalent. The series included, on Christmas Eve, the second-largest bomb ever tested, with a yield of 24.2 megatons.

 

and

 

When a nuclear weapon is detonated in the atmosphere, the neutrons emitted from the blast cause a sudden and quite substantial increase in the 14C content of the atmosphere. The excited carbon immediately combines with oxygen, so the effect of an airburst is to inject a slug of CO2 into the atmosphere that is tagged so that we can watch what happens to it.

 

14C is naturally radioactive with a half life of 5,700 years. It is formed on Earth by nature by the action of galactic cosmic rays on nitrogen and this provides the foundation for radiocarbon dating and for tracing the impact of galactic cosmic rays on Earthโ€™s climate over time. In 1962, the atomic bomb tests injected a huge slug of additional 14C that spread around the globe and was monitored at a number of sites. This clearly provides a means of tracking the mixing time of the atmosphere but there are problems using this data to define sequestration rate of CO2 from the atmosphere into biosphere and ocean sinks as described below.

 

Phil Chapman makes some key observations [1]:

 

The prevailing winds presumably took the cloud of 14CO2 right around the world to the site in Austria, which was 2,000 miles southwest of Novaya Zemlya. It took about two years more to reach New Zealand, in the Southern Hemisphere. At the time of the peak in New Zealand, the concentration was still higher in Austria, indicating that the carbon-14 was not yet evenly distributed in the whole atmosphere. Thus some of the initial decrease in Austria was apparently due to dilution of the cloud as it spread.

 

Figure 2 Atmospheric 14C following atomic bomb tests in Russia in 1962 [1]. The data are useful for examining atmospheric mixing times but can the exponential decline be used to model natural CO2 sequestration rates?

Anonymous ID: e43a06 June 3, 2019, 10:31 p.m. No.6667464   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6667454

copy pasted from

http://euanmearns.com/whats-up-with-the-bomb-model/

 

Even though it is someones blog but the data is hard to ignore. There maybe a link between the jump in the count of radioactive Carbon-14 in the atmosphere and human reproduction rates. The fact that there is a time delay between the onset of bomb released C14 and reproduction rate decline makes sense. it would take sometime for C14 to accumulate in human bodies via ingestion of water, veggies, fruits, milk and meats!