>NEW Q POST
That's NOT Q, you douchebag shill!
Fuck off!
FBI releases files on Bigfoot from records vault
The FBI released 22 documents from its record vault on Wednesday concerning the agency’s investigation into a possible Bigfoot.
The records, dated from 1976 and 1977, chronicle an analysis on an unidentified hair and tissue sample that some believed belonged to Bigfoot. The samples were said to come from “a member of the deer family,” the documents show.
In August 1976, then-Bigfoot Information Center Director Peter Byrne sent a letter to the FBI, urging the agency to test the sample of 15 hairs “attached to a tiny piece of skin.”
“Will you kindly, to set the record straight, once and for all, inform us if the FBI., has examined hair which might be that of a Bigfoot,” the letter reads. “Please understand that our research here is serious. That this is a serious question that needs answering.”
The documents also include a letter from Jay Cochran, who was serving as assistant director of the FBI’s Science and Technical Services Division. In a letter dated February 1977, Cochran wrote to the Academy of Applied Sciences about the FBI’s findings regarding the sample.
The sample was “examined by transmitted and incident light microscopy” and included “a study of morphological characteristics such as root structure, medullary structure and cuticle thickness in addition to scale casts,” the document says.
It continued, “The hairs were compared directly with hairs of known origin under a comparison microscope… It was concluded as a result of these examinations that the hairs are of deer family origin.”
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/447143-fbi-releases-files-on-bigfoot-from-records-vault?__twitter_impression=true
sauce
https://vault.fbi.gov/bigfoot
Ted Cruz replies to 2016 campaign pin
"This man ate my son"
@tedcruz
He was delicious!
>I think the black hats are trying to goad Q into posting to get a clue about who Q is by comparing Q's post time to the real-time visibility of Trump's entourage on his UK/Ireland trip.
Since Q is NOT one person, they'll have a tough time with that, if you were correct! smh
Rand Paul: Deep State Ignored Order to Pull John Brennan’s Security Clearance
Appearing Tuesday on CNN, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) slammed the intelligence community over a recent report claiming it defied an order from President Donald Trump to revoke the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan.
A partial transcript…
HOST BRIANNA KEILAR: I want to ask you, because you’ve been really a critic of John Brennan, who has been a critic of President Trump. You’ve not been a big fan of him. You’ve said that. He’s the former CIA director under President Obama. What do you think about this recent New York Times story that Brennan still has his security clearance? This was such a big, I guess, promise of the president’s, demand of the president. He said he was going to pull it, and he still has it.
SEN. RAND PAUL: Well, this is what worries me. People talk about the Deep State. Now the Deep State is actually protecting their own and not listening to the president’s orders. I was sitting in the White House when President Trump said, “I want his security clearance taken,” and I saw the order given. I saw the chief of staff was there, not the current chief of staff, the previous chief of staff.
And if they’re working against the odds of the president, that really does disrupt our country, does disrupt a representative democracy where the president makes a decision, and if someone is countermanding that, I think we need to get to the bottom of that. And I hope President Trump will say, “who is countermanding my orders. I said get rid of his clearance.” And I do think Brennan has been a partisan. And I think Brennan also abused his office in developing the Trump investigation. I think it was done under false pretenses and done for political reasons.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/05/rand-paul-deep-state-ignored-order-to-pull-john-brennans-security-clearance/
>I saw the order given. I saw the chief of staff was there, not the current chief of staff, the previous chief of staff.
So, Rand Paul is ADMITTING Kelly is DS
How is this even POSSIBLE, aren't guns "banned"?
At Least Four Dead in Darwin, Australia, Mass Shooting
At least four people were killed and a woman injured during a mass shooting in Darwin, Australia, Tuesday evening.
The Guardian reports that the shooting occurred in Darwin’s city center. The gunman was reportedly a 45-year-old Caucasian who was paroled in January and was “well known to police.” https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/04/at-least-four-dead-in-darwin-australia-mass-shooting/
THIS should really piss off China!
US reportedly pursuing $2 billion weapon sale with Taiwan
https://thehill.com/policy/international/asia-pacific/447147-us-reportedly-pursuing-2-billion-weapon-sale-with-taiwan
Pfizer didn't reveal (rheumatoid arthritis) drug's Alzheimer's preventing abilities
A U.S. drug company did not openly share or perform further studies on a successful rheumatoid arthritis medicine that internal researchers suggested was reducing the risk of Alzheimer's disease by 64 percent, according to Washington Post article published Tuesday.
Researchers at Pfizer reportedly urged the firm to conduct a clinical trial after finding the potential hidden benefit of the anti-inflammatory drug Enbrel while analyzing insurance claims.
It was estimated to cost $80 million to conduct the trial, and Pfizer decided to pass.
Pfizer told the Post it did not pursue the clinical trial because its success rate would likely be low.
Enbrel had reached the end of its patent life and its profits were dwindling, meaning it may have made little business sense to invest in the trial, according to the Post.
Outside researchers said it would've helped the medical community for Pfizer to publish its findings, since doing so could have led to further discoveries about the complicated disease.
“It would benefit the scientific community to have that data out there,’’ said Keenan Walker, an assistant professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins who is studying how inflammation contributes to Alzheimer’s. “Whether it was positive data or negative data, it gives us more information to make better informed decisions.’’
At least one medical ethicist agreed.
"Having acquired the knowledge, refusing to disclose it to those who might act upon it hides a potential benefit, and thereby wrongs and probably harms those at risk of developing Alzheimer’s by impeding research,’’ Bobbie Farsides, professor of clinical and biomedical ethics at Brighton and Sussex Medical School in the United Kingdom, told the Post.
In a statement to The Hill, Pfizer said, "Our decision not to publish a statistical analysis of insurance claims data, and our decision NOT to pursue a broader clinical trial in Alzheimer’s disease based on such statistical analysis were based first and foremost on scientific rationale and not on the basis of financial incentives as the story seems to imply."
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/447114-drug-company-didnt-reveal-alzheimers-preventing-abilities-report