reposted from LB, please this on

DIGG on articles that may appear on child pornography appearing on 8chan today

From last bread; all links are PAST BREAD:

▶Anonymous 06/07/19 (Fri) 12:36:00 6b37a9 (1) No.6695614>>6695675

>>6695598

was prolly mockingbird msm agents who posted the cp

let's hope fbi/le can id the fuckers and arrest them

————-

Anonymous (You) 06/07/19 (Fri) 12:43:04 e22790 (9) No.6695675

>>6695688

>>6695614

I was just thinking about that (hope it's not true).

ANONS, look for articles on CP being posted on this board. If found, who on the authors and what the pubs do they work for? Also, how quick did the articles come out? Were the authors briefed in advance?

Here is new post discussing latest stuff on anti-Q articles:

>>6675051

>>6675058

———-

Initial results (12:45 pm PDT)

nothing yet on Bing or Google

see

>>6695688 pb

>>6695772 pb

>>6695850

IMO, could use "eyes on" (look to see if reporters report on this, see >>6695843, because MSM will use anything to make us look bad). Advantages in not notablizing CP attack is that we can see whether the press picks up on it and how they would frame it. Best scenario: nothing happens and we refocus our efforts on IRL news.

>>6695979

Boy, that was fast.

I haven't been here from the start, just last summer.

Oldfags, with past CP attacks, has Twitter picked up on them or not? Is this Twitterfest typical?

>>6695998

No, just puts off newfags and allows MSM and politicians to say we're racist.

>>6696050

Thanks anon, worth reading.

>>6696063

Well, you probably saw the "8chan has CP" twat

>>6695979

so it's going to make the rounds to some extent. How will the story get told? We'll see.

>>6696134

>>6696089

Be careful about linking this new article with the CP attack on the board. There are hit pieces written all the time about Q, an average of at least one a day (and that's on a slow month).

CAPS are from

>>6675051 pb

>>6696187

It's a judgment call, whether we try to figure out what is "newsworthy" and appropriate, usually with little time to reflect. Didn't realize just how challenging that is until I bakered. (Many anons say it's deciding on notables that keeps them from baking.) But we take our best shot and hope to hit the mark most of the time. Good to get multiple points of view, tho. You're probably being sarcastic toward the end….but you actually make a good point. How the media discovers (or creates) the news is something worth tracking.

>>6696250

'whether' is wrong word, changed the sentence midstream. Delete it and add a period? Yes, that works.

>>6696326

Appreciate everyone's ideas, glad to hear yours, gotta run got IRL, cheers.