>>6844709

time machines dont exist… time is a false perception to relate other physical aspects such as expansion/movement of dimensions with respect to other ones..

the nature of reality is a multiverse.. deal with it… when one "goes back in time" you are actually slipping into another universe

if time was actually linear then a paradox would of been created at some point in the future and collapsed to the past… in essence you wouldnt even realize you or the universe even existed… essentially halting its existence before if had a chance to exist

good luck shillin bitch

>>6844724

einsteins theories are based on two postulates that have no factual basis…. these postulates are what i refer to as the gods of science…

time dilation cant even be directly observed… theoretically speaking… just walking at a casual pace causes dilation and is most likely a representation of slipping into another universe that is being navigated by choices and decisions…

this is how scientists currently study time dilation… hey look… the clock has different times… realistically… both clocks may be from a separate universe

>>6844727

depends on the universe we wind up in… here is the kicker about the multiverse concept… you in essence are a god of your universe and the decisions you make in your life may actually alter the outcome of events for your observation whereas people you talked to 10minutes ago may end up in a different outcome and those you speak to came across from another universe… when these lapses are small… an observer wouldnt even realize this had occurred

>>6844734

newton may of gotten gravity wrong… i dont think it exists which is why gravity "falls apart" at the subatomic level and they have yet to discover the higs boson particle …

i see the universe as a culmination of waves… we typically refer to them as electromagnetic waves… but in reality there isnt a single physicist that can tell you exactly what an electric charge or magnetic field actually is… they just know what can be done with it

>>6844740

im with this guy… nikola tesla understood the universe better than einstein, newton or schrodinger

>>6844736

eh then how would you define a single manifested verse? we typically refer to that as a universe

>>6844749

i think therefore i am

as you hold upon earth i will hold them true in heaven (forgot precise biblical quote)

here is a noodle scratcher for someone to ponder…

if nothing in itself is a form of existence… then what exactly is nonexistence

>>6844754

infinity is a hell of a drug… but thats the nature of the universe and multiverse

>>6844764

there isnt any difference

>>6844765

thats how i feel about quantum physics… they are just proving their own bullshit… i described to to a professor as trying to use a square to define a circle

sorry if i get deep into this physics shit… but its a passion of mine

>>6844774

i think therefore i am… albeit philosophers would call this a circular argument and if taken at the base level they would be correct… but the concept has deeper meaning that seems to allude most of them

>>6844775

ill do what i can… i cant necessarily give you all the answers but i can try to point you down a good path

>>6844777

you are describing a concept i find at the core of buddhism … that we are all one in the same and eventually return to the one

the way i used to visualize it when i was younger was to pick to points on a circle… then determine how many paths you can take to connect the two points inside of the circle.. its infinite lol

>>6844777

i wouldnt stress mathmatics too much… math is just a tool developed on logic that simulates the nature of the universe… it requires several different types in engineering to even make the equations workable… such as calculus, algebra and mathematics developed upon the sqrt(-1) [imaginary numbers]… forgot the specific name for it … tired as fuck right now to be honest

>>6844787

eh… we got downtime i think… i got the feeling the plan is already in motion and what we are doing is only serving our thirst for knowledge to inform ourselves about what the future may hold and when (hence Q being so quiet)

i think our job was and is simple… rattle the cage of the deep state to let them know the sleeping giant has awoke… and then when reality starts to set in on the normies… comfort and guide them the best we can to accept the new reality

>>6844798

every class i took i questioned everything i learned and remembered the flaws in the lessons… hence why i question the existence of gravity

>>6844804

and why i know there isnt a physicist that can tell you what exactly a magnetic field is…

furthermore…. i wouldnt be here if i wasnt aware of the bullshit that permeates academia … im well aware of how simple/close minded professors are and can be… ive had many a battles with them

>>6844806

maybe in the sense of centripetal force… i think its a misunderstand of moments in electromagnetic attraction

>>6844807

its simultaneously both a singularity and an infinite expansion … it just depends on how you care to perceive it at any given moment

>>6844807

no beginning… no end…

i actually find that fact quite comforting

>>6844817

=) … i plan to make it my lifes work… for its really the only thing i find of interest anymore lol

and i hope that your current situation improves so that you can be free to explore once again

>>6844820

thats why i say its the same thing… i cannot tell you how often math is dependent primarily on a number between 0 and 1… i guess it could be explained like this…

0<X<=1 :: X = multiverse … and and constant represents a universe

>>6844820

its both if you think about it… lets say you have a number that is just barely larger than 0… say … 10^-100000000000000000000000…

multiply that number by infinity… and you still get infinity

>>6844828

trust me i feel ya… im tired as fuck… i dont pick apart what people say as long as i understand the message

>>6844786

oh man… thats going to burn her ass… no way in hell someone would avidly watch their rapist on TV… but us anons already knew she was full of shit… but hey… at least we have more firepower

>>6844839

im no molecular biologist but aside from a few minor points… the document doesnt seem to make clear what the engineered bacterium was designed to do… you could look up the proteins/rna thats described … but i cant help you much with that..

after you identify the proteins/rna you then need to look at its metabolic pathways to infer what the hell its being used for.. but i sincerely doubt you will be able to gather that from a public document… thats usually need to know level classification

but i will say this… you can adapt e coli using recombinant DNA rings to modify features such as resistance… its actually common to do in a school lab as an experiment

>>6844857

yea… ur probably going to need to go deeper than basic atoms to settle gravity

like i said… i think its a misunderstanding of forces with is why it does not have an affect on subatomic particles

>>6844857

if anything i would argue that the isotope is unstable because of the electromagnetic forces that are mistake for gravity creating a pressure if you will on the isotope causing it to break down… you might have an element that can "produce" gravity but it may not "produce" gravity for the reasons we understand to be modern physics

>>6844874

i second the notable… it destroys her rape argument completely

>>6844865

it honestly sounds like she was fucking with him the whole time and making the network look like a bunch of asses … that last little bit with anderson cooper is what sealed the deal for me… it just looked like she was trolling him

>>6844884

its almost like you are altering the electromagnetic pathways of the electrons and to a lesser degree the protons that collapses those found in the environment … and if pushed far enough can simulate what we fundamentally call gravity

>>6844891

you mean a reaction… what newton law was that… for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction… i believe that applies to forces and momentum… call it a "consequence" if you must

>>6844897

and carries its own energy… that supplies power in the form of a force… im an engineer and basically all engineering is is the transfer of energy… (via force)

>>6844901

is studying the transfer of energy*

>>6844897

one thing i like about standard versus metric… is that standard recognizes that acceleration and mass are still just theoretical concepts

>>6844903

to be more precise… its what i would call an electromagnetic moment (or is currently being described as gravitational waves) … i personally believe the answer lies inside of blackbody radiation

>>6844908

but we can only measure gravitational forces… the mass X acceleration is still theoretical

>>6844913

oh we can show an object can have a force such as weight… but we cannot prove that acceleration and mass are independent concepts… hence why physicists are scrambling to find the higgs-boson particle

>>6844913

and fyi… i can do the kinematic calculations as if the concepts were proven… but i know that it is still just theory

>>6844939

and you need to learn to understand the difference between theory and fact

>>6844941

fact - we can directly observe a force

theory - mass exists

>>6844960

until mass is proven… the concept of acceleration remains a theory as well … for those two do not work independently outside of calculations that allow us to anticipate a result of a system…

without mass… there is no acceleration to relate to.. thus we are left with forces which can be directly observed…

the F = m x a is just a handy tool we use at the moment but this may not always be the case… in time F = F(C,Beta,N, …)

>>6844962

first people need to realize science has become its own religion in the modern age with its gods being postulates (quantized packets, all references with similar physics, nothing can go faster than light, etc)… this is arguably one of the main reasons why people need to play with these ideas outside of academia… because they have gotten so full of their own shit… take global climate change/global warming as a prime example of this

>>6844972

and according to scientists … 6 sigma is sufficient to prove the law even though it never reaches 100%

>>6844972

in fact lets see what einstein had to say about the subject…

even he recognized the limitations

>>6844991

eh i could see why he didnt reply…

the real question is… what is real science… how do i know the world that i "observe" even exists… because my senses tell me it does… could just be a simulation for all i know..

the trick is keeping an open mind and realizing that even the greatest scientists are humans … and therefore flawed

well im going to bed… and with all that being said…

whoever was arguing with me… dont give up going in the direction you are going.. you may discover something great… just maybe not understand completely why its true… but that doesnt mean you cant do great things

good night anons

ps..

and to the one that referred to us as physics shills…i suggest taking an interest at some point since these principles far outweigh any strife we perceive to have on planet earth… and this includes all Q is doing… we are but a small spec in the universe

pps

Q is real imo

>>6845004

mass and velocity are dependent on the existence of mass… disprove mass then you will have to redefine the terms we commonly call acceleration and velocity

>>6845014

momentum (observable) related through mass x velocity

force (observable) related through mass x acceleration

distance is nothing more than proportional relationships that we quantize to perform calculations and estimates

>>6845020

huh.. it was my understanding that a shill is someone attempting to derail the Q movement for evil or selfish gains… but i guess some of us are just more simplistic