>>7116117

>Q confirmed landings

Q also wrote about "mirrors and disinfo is necessary"

Q also wrote that an actual plane flew into the pentagon, which I seriously doubt.

>so THINK LOGICALLY:

>If the landings WERE faked for propaganda

Let's assume Q was actually posting the raw truth in that post.

Then Q only confirmed that moon landings are real. Not that the public moon landing broadcast was real (I'm pretty sure the Q&A questions that Q answered were not coming from actual anons and were designed to be exactly like that).

Also simply think about the risk of an actual broadcast like this would have been.

Tons of children watching.

Accident happens.

Astronauts die.

You cut the broadcast, okay, but how do you get out of it?

You can't.

It would be a PR disaster.

That's why I'm pretty much certain that the broadcast was fake. Think logically.

"You are watching a movie"

Now?

Yes?

For the last XXX years?

"Drops 'layered' to provide 'advance knowledge'."

Layers.

>you’d think NA

Maybe even the astronauts thought it was all real until they figured out they were actors in a game.

You think everyone at NASA is in on it?

>So what did he see?

Reflections, probably.