Anonymous ID: 97e5cb July 22, 2019, 4:14 a.m. No.7130122   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0131

>>7130110

>That is GOD.

To you maybe. And then I guess you can define "evil" as separation from it.

But you are just running in circles then. Why call it evil and not absence of the things you define as god?

Also I can find a lot of religious people that will disagree wholeheartedly and find your definition blasphemous.

Anonymous ID: 97e5cb July 22, 2019, 4:18 a.m. No.7130140   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0148

>>7130131

>I follow GOD and try to follow Jesus's teachings.

GOD is goodness (paraphrased from your previous post)

Then how could it father Jesus? How could it command and punish Adam and Eve? etc. etc ?

 

You are not religious… you just follow the religious teachings…

Anonymous ID: 97e5cb July 22, 2019, 4:24 a.m. No.7130171   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0178

>>7130148

>I have my version of GOD

Good for you. Nice cop out though. That way you don't have to defend your beliefs

Not that I care. Believe what you want. Just don't claim your beliefs as facts.

You believe you know GOD. You don't know GOD. When you can prove that you know GOD then you can start making claims.

 

I'm sick and tired of all the Biblefags here. Asserting their beliefs as facts. Especially because you can't even agree amongst yourself.