Anonymous ID: 5abcce July 30, 2019, 7:19 a.m. No.7258159   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8165

Top GOP Senator Warned the White House About Trump's Choice for National Intelligence Director

 

President Donald Trump’s decision to name a staunch Republican ally with a limited background in spycraft to replace Dan Coats as the nation’s top intelligence official has aroused concern on Capitol Hill, including a warning to the White House from the Republican head of the Senate Intelligence Committee. But among veteran members of the nation’s intelligence agencies the mood is resignation.

 

In naming Texas Rep. John Ratcliffe to be Director of National Intelligence, Trump ignored a warning from Republican Sen. Richard Burr, the chairman of the intelligence committee, according to Congressional aides familiar with the matter. Burr told the White House last week that the move would inject more partisan politics into the work of the intelligence agencies, said the sources, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the matter.

 

The 2004 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA) stipulates that the DNI must have “extensive national security experience”. Ratcliffe was a prosecutor and politician in Texas and has served on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for only seven months. Coats and his predecessors in the job all had years of experience in the intelligence community, overseeing it, and serving as U.S. ambassadors.

 

Burr’s office declined to comment on his communications with the White House regarding Ratcliffe. The White House did not immediately return a request for comment.

 

https://time.com/5637792/trump-ratcliffe-warning-burr/

 

Is Dick Burr on the take??

Anonymous ID: 5abcce July 30, 2019, 7:36 a.m. No.7258368   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This is shaping up to be the only way Ratcliffe gets appointed. National Security concerns…

 

Scaramucci model.

 

https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/2/essays/93/recess-appointments-clause