Anonymous ID: 951147 July 30, 2019, 2:12 p.m. No.7264016   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4146 >>4473 >>4668 >>4691

Former Federal Prosecutor Confirms Rep. John Ratcliffe’s Role In Holy Land Foundation Case

A former federal prosecutor involved in the terrorism financing case against the Holy Land Foundation confirmed that Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, was appointed to investigate specific criminal allegations raised during the federal trial.

July 30, 2019 By Sean Davis

 

A former federal prosecutor involved in the terrorism financing trial against the Holy Land Foundation confirmed to The Federalist today that Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, whom President Donald Trump has said he intends to nominate as director of national intelligence, did receive a special appointment as part of the case.

 

“John was appointed to look into allegations of potential misconduct involving a juror and one or more of the defendants in that case,” Nathan Garrett, a formal federal prosecutor who worked on the trial team, told The Federalist Tuesday morning. “John is a stellar lawyer, experienced national security prosecutor and leader, and a man of the highest character.”

 

ABC News alleged in an article that Ratcliffe “misrepresented” and “embellished” his role in the case, even suggesting that he was not involved with it at all.

 

“ABC News could find no public court records that connect Ratcliffe to either of the two trials for the case,” the article claimed. “Former officials directly involved in the decade-long Holy Land Foundation investigation could not recall Ratcliffe having any role, and four former defense attorneys who served on the cases told ABC News on Monday they had no recollection of Ratcliffe being involved with any of the proceedings that resulted in the convictions of their clients.”

 

Garrett, who is listed on the federal court docket for the Holy Land Foundation case as one of the prosecutors of record representing the United States, told The Federalist that ABC News never contacted him for comment prior to publishing its article.

 

“No,” he responded when asked directly whether anyone from ABC News contacted him about its story.

 

He also noted it is not surprising that Ratcliffe’s role would not have been public at the time, given the sensitive nature of terrorism cases.

 

“I served as a ‘terrorism prosecutor’ before and after 9/11, and 98% of the work in that arena never saw the light of day,” Garrett said. “Folks like John were thrust into what had traditionally been an intelligence community-only environment and expected to engage and provide leadership and perspective as those matters progressed.”

 

“It was trial by fire, and he handled it exceedingly well, albeit outside of the public eye,” Garrett said.

 

The former federal prosecutor and FBI special agent also offered a personal endorsement of Ratcliffe’s nomination and confirmation as director of national intelligence.

 

“In my 20 years in the business, there’s no one I believe more capable of this position than John,” he said.

 

On July 28, Trump announced via Twitter that he intended to nominate Ratcliffe to replace former Sen. Dan Coats, R-Ind., as director of national intelligence following Coats’ retirement on Aug. 15.

 

Ratcliffe has drawn the ire of left-wing conspiracy theorists who have for years claimed, without evidence, that Trump treasonously colluded with the Russian government to steal the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton. Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, who was appointed as special counsel in May of 2017 to investigate allegations of treasonous Russian collusion, found there was no collusion or conspiracy with Russians to steal the 2016 elections.

 

Ratcliffe has repeatedly said the American public deserves to know who was behind the conspiracy theory and whether they weaponized false information to spy on American citizens in the heat of a political campaign.

 

A spokeswoman for Ratcliffe’s congressional office also confirmed Ratcliffe’s role in the Holy Land Foundation case.

 

“Shortly following a declared mistrial in a terrorism financing prosecution, United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, et al. in the Northern District of Texas on Oct. 22, 2007, a Justice Department order appointed U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas John Ratcliffe to investigate issues related to the outcome of the Holy Land case,” she told The Federalist.

 

“Department of Justice records will confirm that as both chief of anti-terrorism and national security for the Eastern District of Texas and as U.S. attorney, John Ratcliffe opened, managed, and supervised numerous domestic and international terrorism-related cases.”

https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/30/former-federal-prosecutor-confirms-rep-john-ratcliffes-role-in-holy-land-foundation-case/

Anonymous ID: 951147 July 30, 2019, 2:22 p.m. No.7264151   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4195 >>4214 >>4286 >>4306 >>4503 >>4668 >>4691

A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit brought by the Democratic National Committee against a laundry list of defendants they blamed for a conspiracy to 'steal' the 2016 US election from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Defendants included the Russian Federation, the Trump Campaign, Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, George Papadopoulos, Richard Gates, Roger Stone, Joseph Mifsud, WikiLeaks, Julian Assange and several Russians.

 

In his Tuesday afternoon order, judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York ruled that the DNC's arguments were "either moot or without merit."

 

Following the April release of the Mueller report, lawyers for most of the defendants asked the court to penalize the DNC for alleging a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia - arguing that Mueller's findings revealed the "doomed effort to prove a falsehood."

 

"The assumption, of course, was that the Special Counsel would substantiate the DNC’s claims," wrote lawyers for the Trump campaign. "Suffice it to say, that assumption did not pan out."

 

The campaign’s lawyers said the report “debunks any such conclusion by walking through the vast body of evidence that his Office collected and establishing that none of this evidence showed that the Campaign formed any sort of agreement with Russia.”

 

They said the report shows the DNC can never prove its key allegations, “yet has refused to accept this reality.”

 

“The DNC has thus made clear that it wants to proceed with a politically motivated sham case, tying up the resources of this Court and the Campaign — and inevitably burdening the President himself — all in a doomed effort to prove a falsehood,” the lawyers wrote.

 

The lawyers included exhibits with their filing showing that Trump campaign attorney Michael Carvin sent the DNC a May 13 letter demanding that it dismiss all of its claims against the campaign within three weeks or he’d seek sanctions. -AP

 

Developing…

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-30/judge-tosses-dnc-lawsuit-against-trump-russia-assange-wikileaks-and-kitchen-sink