Anonymous ID: 26392d Aug. 1, 2019, 12:47 p.m. No.7297078   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7106 >>7164 >>7175 >>7196 >>7204 >>7250

>>7296797

Charging Comey with the Cut-Out Case Would have been a Huge mistake

 

Lawfag here,

There is a reason the prosecutors were unanimous in the decision not to charge Comey with the "cut out" case of leaking that memo on purpose, the same reason he baited them by admitting to the whole thing.

 

Charging him with the cut-out means without any of the FISA stuff. The FISA warrant is the criminal intent of the illegal leak. I know that none of these laws have "criminal intent" as a necessary element and that they don't require that for ordinary peons, but the fact is that "criminal intent" is constitutionally necessary for any criminal law. They blair "ignorance of the law is not excuse" but actually, it is. Criminal intent is called "mens rea" or guilty state of mind, and every first year law student learns that it is essential. The USSA court system has figured out way to circumvent this requirement. A snake like Comey might have good enough lawyers and sympathetic judges to get away with this.

 

Waiting and chargning him with the FISA stuff minimizes this problem. Comey leaked his memo so that a FISA warrant could be granted based on the false info in the leak being published in a paper. Trying this case as a "cut out" means you can't bring in any of the FISA stuff. This would be fighting the fight with both hands tied behind your back. There are indeed people who's asses I could kick with both hands tied behind my back 9 times out of 10, but if I am going to fight them for 1 million dollars, I want my hands. (MMA fag too - who wrestles around with other guys half naked besides a fag I reckon)

Anonymous ID: 26392d Aug. 1, 2019, 12:49 p.m. No.7297106   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7297078

>A snake like Comey might have good enough lawyers and sympathetic judges to get away with this.

 

by that I mean, seeing that the constitutional requirement of a "mens rea" which he did have, was present and there would certainly be room for reasonable doubt on that without considering the FISA warrant.

Anonymous ID: 26392d Aug. 1, 2019, 12:53 p.m. No.7297175   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7297078

Comey would love to have a half-assed case brought against him first and win

 

Charging some one that the media is hell-bent on protecting with a weak case then losing and charging them with a stronger case would be damn near impossible. Once you lose, the media will say that is "malicious and repeated prosecution for the same crime" which is exactly what the feds do. Sometimes they impose fines on people who beat them in court as well.

 

The hell of it is, the courts (federal) do so much that does violate the constitution in order to keep their private prisons full, that the system is functioning much more like it is supposed to in all cases when a snake like Comey gets off on these "technicalities" that are supposed to protect all of us.

 

the paper trail on this guy is rock solid and he needs to go down, but they have to be sure they get him.

Anonymous ID: 26392d Aug. 1, 2019, 12:59 p.m. No.7297234   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7297204

thanks,

You are right about the special counsel, I believe, but what about getting a FISA warrant under false pretenses. That is perjury, and if it was to remove a president, that is Treason right there. If it was just to spy, that is still a criminal 4th amendment violation. 4th requires that warrants precede from probable cause by a neutral magistrate.