Anonymous ID: a343a0 Dec. 1, 2019, 2:42 a.m. No.7404967   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

What are anon thoughts on why Al Franken would write about getting "the jew call" before 911, not to go to work that day.

 

Sincere effort at disclosure? Doubtful.

 

Part of their "must reveal their shit to the people" karma-esque rule? After the fact too?

 

Did he owe them something and was made to be one of the "stick your neck out" people to give subtle disclosure?

 

Perhaps more importantly, the fact that a book disclosed this just 2 years after 911, and 17 years later after that, 95%+ of the public is still clueless, should be a serious wake-up call to the vast majority of people who think that something leaking, in and of itself, is a big deal. A leak must be accompanied by MASSIVE promotion thru all forms of media and Hollywood before it actually takes root in the public conscious. Furthermore, it seems such a truth (any) can be UNROOTED if the contrary is then preached back at the people endlessly for the following X number of years.

 

For the masses, what they constantly incline their eyes and ears to is what they will believe. "Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God" seems to apply to "faith/belief" in damn near anything, as long as you're constantly barraged with "hearing" it.

Anonymous ID: a343a0 Dec. 1, 2019, 5:03 a.m. No.7405095   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5325

>>7405086

Anons might wanna take note of digits/message here.

 

Posted PRIOR to 2 posts above it. Just a shot in the dark here, but I think it needed that "757" and "86" combo. Board made my following post waitโ€“reason I noticed.