BAKER
>>7435380 (lb)
>Hi Baker, I've dropped the final update of and thus replacement of >>7415245 Q Graphics all in GMT #89 seen here >>7435148 with CommsAnon to give us a >>>/comms/ link to replace this, soon, hopefully. Cannot for the life of me get it to upload here. It took two days to get it up on /comms/.
i
was posted >>>/comms/5772
now archived
new
Q Graphics all in GMT #84-#89 >>>/comms/5510, >>>/comms/5577, >>>/comms/5622, >>>/comms/5699, >>>/comms/5700, >>>/comms/5773
>Radio frequency burns could not happen but microwave frequency burns can.
silly! RF burns can happen from almost any frequency if there is enough power
>Mostly cook you from the inside out.
if the frequency is the typical 2.4Ghz used in microwave ovens, then yes, it's evenly cooked all through due to the heating of the water molecules
in general RF burns can be serious and depend greatly on the power and frequency involved
>Both RF and 60-Hz fields are classified as nonionizing radiation because the frequency is too low for there to be enough photon energy to ionize atoms. Still, at sufficiently high power densities, EMR poses certain health hazards. It has been known since the early days of radio that RF energy can cause injuries by heating body tissue. In extreme cases, RF-induced heating can cause blindness, sterility and other serious health problems. These heat-related health hazards are called thermal effects. In addition, there is evidence that magnetic fields may produce biologic effects at energy levels too low to cause body heating. The proposition that these athermal effects may produce harmful health consequences has produced a great deal of research.
http://www.arrl.org/rf-radiation-and-electromagnetic-field-safety
you won't find much on it, but the old HAM operators & military RADAR operators know
the remarkable thing about a dancing bear is not how well it dances, it's that it dances at all