>>7445971

>The filename that you see on QMAP or QPub is actually a Wikileaks LINK!

>Ok? Get it?

You are not only dumb as a rock, but stubborn like that as well and unable to remember or read old breads.

Not a good combination at all….

Some simple experimentation on wikileaks' search function goes over your head a little?

It's been shown that this a an artifact of wikileaks search function taking only a part of the search query and throwing out results according to that.

Go fuck yourself already with this old "muh wikileaks emailses"-slide that has nothing to do with file names of Q's images.

>>7446039

>faggot shill fucktard

Great Job and outstanding research as well.

Best argument in the world instead of verifying how wikileaks' search function actually works.

Nominate you for the Excellent Research Gold Star Medal.

And since you're such a moran, they'd better give you two.

>>7446141

>>7446173

>Doesn't understand that wikileaks truncates links to email IDs internally after numbers

>So dumb & stubborn, keeps calling others pointing it out shills

>Continues relentlessly as if it would matter or anyone cared

Yup, (you) deserve two medals.

Hell, if I could I'd give you three.

Please proceed with your excellent research! Maybe even publish it, you might get a (you) from Q, or even that Nobel prize if news get's around.

>>7446230

>The idea of giving more exposure to the Clinton emails is good

Agreed. But not with an entirely brainless and unsubstantial, more than one year old slide that has been debunked more than once long ago.

>>7446279

>>7446330

>Winning.

>Death to Shills

Uh huh … South Africa ….

Your arguments for "winning" sound not very convincing tbh

But go right ahead and pop the Champagne.

https://www.iol.co.za/capeargus/news/hearings-to-continue-despite-two-charges-being-dropped-against-anti-abortion-doctor-38680379

"De Vos will be taken to task on the first charge, which is that of dissuading a patient from terminating her pregnancy in 2016 when he was at 2 Military Hospital in Wynberg, and the second charge, which accuses him of failing to respect the patient’s autonomy."