Anonymous ID: 6886b0 Dec. 8, 2019, 5 a.m. No.7454684   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7454540

I have to say when I first heard the so called 'expert' Joseph Uscinski I was pissed because I thought he under represented what we are all about, and the use of the term 'Conspiracy Theory' puts up instant red flag. But then I thought about it. How else would you get the message out to the masses. There has to be some Shock value you can't just bring up the fact that QAnon is about exposing corruption worldwide in all its forms people will tune out. So jumping head first into the satanic pedo's was great, and then pivoting straight into Epstein was perfect. For the first time our movement we actually got positive MSM coverage.

 

Hats off to Jessie's "Friend"

 

Sorry for the incoherent ramble I haven't had my covefefe yet

 

And for the record NO ONE EVER SAID THAT GUY WAS Q! LMFAO

Anonymous ID: 6886b0 Dec. 8, 2019, 6:31 a.m. No.7454988   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7454957

 

>If prior IG reports are predictive we should see something akin to:

 

…Everyone collectively just happened to make identical mistakes, at the same time, in the same direction, together with all the administrative staff within all intelligence organizations… many of them were professionally trained lawyers… but no-one did anything wrong on purpose….

 

Barr/Durham Time

 

>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/08/varying-expectations-for-ig-horowitz-report-the-convenient-application-of-intent/#more-178081