Anonymous ID: 6b470b Dec. 8, 2019, 6:30 a.m. No.7454982   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4991 >>5012 >>5017

My take on the @Jessewatters interview re: Q >>we have been effectively labeled as conspiracy theorists. Jesse made no stop every time that POV called us that. I do not believe that POTUS will ever be asked “The Question” as long as this group of really incredible awesome researchers are labeled conspiracy nuts due to Article 25.

 

Right now, as it stands, if POTUS were to go along with the question and affirm, given the current climate of impeachment et al, we would ALL be in a very bad place. Optics.

 

So. We are not being exposed in a favorable light and if anything we’ve taken a really big hit to our credibility.

 

That’s just the way I see it. 😊

Anonymous ID: 6b470b Dec. 8, 2019, 6:34 a.m. No.7455005   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5014

>>7454991

And I have no issue with that whatsoever. I realize my particular viewpoint is not popular but at some point we have to be taken seriously and come off of the conspiracy shelf. 😊. I believe this must happen before POTUS can readily answer “The Question “.

 

Need to keep in mind that Q stated we may have to “force this one.” He’s probably right. (Duh… he’s always right)

Anonymous ID: 6b470b Dec. 8, 2019, 6:42 a.m. No.7455043   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5050

>>7455017

I would be shocked if it was only 10%. I thinks it’s a LOT more. Maybe I was expecting too much and the exposure of Q is still very early in the game. Baby steps. 😊