Anonymous ID: fe9af7 Dec. 8, 2019, 3:55 a.m. No.7454540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4548 >>4608 >>4684 >>4804 >>5034

Jesse Watters' so-called conspiracy theory expert unwittingly proved Q to be 100% legitimate.

 

He tried so hard to make Q's claims sound outlandish but it boomeranged…

 

Joseph Uscinski: "Q claimed to have secret insider knowledge of a battle going on between Donald Trump against the deep state and this deep state was made up of satanic pedophiles who were selling children into sex slavery and the Trump presidency was really about dismantling this network of satanic pedophiles that included Hillary Clinton and john podesta - and then sending these people off to Guantanamo where they would be tried for their crimes and then summarily hung. And when that happened it would be called the Great Awakening."

 

Ladies and Gentlemen, I present exhibit one - Geoffrey Epstein.

 

Satanic Pedophile: (((Check)))

Children sold into sex slavery: Check - Epstein previously jailed for soliciting minors (we know he did much worse).

Sent to Prison: Check

Tried for their crimes: Check - Epstein was previously tried but got a sweetheart deal so was recently arrested again.

Summarily hung: Check - Official cause of death was hanging.

 

https://youtu.be/3JwIw_LrRJI?t=1288

Anonymous ID: fe9af7 Dec. 8, 2019, 4:07 a.m. No.7454560   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4563 >>4645

>>7454548

 

>>Up next, a private investigator who dug into Jeffrey Epstein, his little black book, and flights with Bill Clinton..

 

Indeed, anon. You would hope that some viewers made the connection by the context. A shame that Watters didn't do it overtly. Was he feigning bias against Q for his own safety as Q hinted? It sure looked that way. Baby steps for the normies, I guess.

Anonymous ID: fe9af7 Dec. 8, 2019, 4:27 a.m. No.7454597   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7454563

>The fact that the guest was able to say "Satanic Pedophile Elites" with neither the guest or the host breaking out in laughter was a big win for us, imho.

 

I agree it's a win and I did give Watters some credit for doing the segment but the guest was trying to make the claims sound outlandish. That was the point of my original post. The "expert" is a frequent contributor to WaPo and thinks all people who believe in "conspiracy theories" are nuts.

Feels like our time has arrived.