I know the perfect Being (God) exists from the fact that I have the idea of God in my mind, and my mind, being imperfect, would never have been capable of fabricating this idea from its own resources. The idea of a perfect God in my imperfect mind MUST have come from God.

I need not 'follow' any particular organized faith as the one true path, but I can and do see blessed, humble, self-aware passages in EVERY faith.

I see how each and every human being on Earth is connected to God.

I practise and encourage in all a revelation of self-understanding that we are all beings with free thought, where POSITIONS on truth comes from logic, reason and empiricism - gifts to us from God - and not authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma - tools of human power and control over free thought.

I am connected to each and every human being on Earth by virtue of being a creation of God.

I decide for myself, I am free from outside opinion.

I decide for myself, I am objective in my conclusions.

I decide for myself, I am true in my own beliefs.

I decide for myself, I am open to following the facts.

I decide for myself, I am strong in defending my beliefs.

I decide for myself, I am resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements.

I decide for myself, I am free.

Those who attack me.

Those who mock me.

Those who cull me.

Those who control me.

Those who label me.

They do not represent me.

They represent themselves.

They do not mentally enslave me.

They are projecting their own mental enslavement.

I am awake.

I am not afraid.

>>7501479

To assert that nothing exists outside of my mind, is to make a claim about reality that contradicts what solipsism purports to convey.

Solipsism is self-contradictory.

Or, in short, if nothing outside of my mind exists, who shall I say is telling me what 'you' are telling me? Are you denying your own mind which cannot be?

>>7501536

Thanks Rabbi!

Keep "da Jews" victim #1.

[Ignore Satanists]

>>7501446

Thanks Rabbi!

HERE'S A SHEKEL FOR YOUR JEWS VICTIM #1 FAKE ATTACK NARRATIVE.

>>7501591

"the answer is because if a perfect god could put something in your mind he could put anything in your mind including me."

Doubling down on contradicting yourself isn't a valid rebuttal.

You just presumed the existence of God to put that supposed thought you described in my head.

But if you presume a God to have done that, then there is more than just my imperfect mind.

Keep going, maybe you'll awaken more people here.

"i made no contradiction by stating what you perceive as "ME" or life or anything including your perceived body and 4 dimensions can not be proved to exist outside of your consciousnesses wherever that may reside"

Tripling down on contradicting yourself is also not a valid rebuttal.

By asserting there is nothing outside of my mind, you are making a claim that contradicts what solipsism purports to convey.

In order to even claim there is only my mind, presupposes truth claim of reality that contradicts solipsism.

You can't square a circle.

>>7501740

"i made no contradiction by stating what you perceive as "ME" or life or anything including your perceived body and 4 dimensions can not be proved to exist outside of your consciousnesses wherever that may reside"

Tripling down on contradicting yourself is also not a valid rebuttal.

By asserting there is nothing outside of my mind, you are making a claim that contradicts what solipsism purports to convey.

In order to even claim there is only my mind, presupposes truth claim of reality that contradicts solipsism.

>>7501740

"if you believe that to be so then anything else you experience could also have been put there"

That again CONTRADICTS solipsism. Presuming a God put that idea in my mind presupposes more than just my mind.

Solipsism is an abortive nihilistic and flawed attempt at philosophy.

>>7501740

"you could be a hard drive on a shelf and not tell any difference from "life""

This also contradicts solipsism. There cannot be a hard drive on a shelf if all there is, is my mind

>>7501740

And you're plagiarizing the arguments of solipsism that others before you originated.

>>7501903

By presuming they are merely my rebuttals in my owj head you are merely begging the question.

Thanks for copypasta'ing the crude summary of the solipsistic writings of others without attribution, and then chastising others for doing what you yourself did.

Your lack of self–awareness is palpable.