Anonymous ID: c8de20 Dec. 15, 2019, 1:56 a.m. No.7512831   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2844 >>2854 >>2861 >>2882 >>3003 >>3044 >>3337

Unshakable confidence.

Information warfare targets+manages what percentage of the population believes x, y, z.

They track those who speak against the narrative, those who inspire others to say they disagree. If one person stands up and says they don't agree, it opens the window for others to say they disagree. If 10% of the population hold an unshakable belief, then it propogates to the entire population.

They're terrified of the domino affect we've already started

Our enemy needs to know what unshakable beliefs we hold so they can inject doubt into it.

The key here is to hold an absolute belief. Find the bullet proof belief you hold about Q, Distill it down to a digestable sentence, and spread it like wildfire.

eg: Epstein didn't kill himself.

eg: Q is a backchannel between Americas Military Intellegence and You, the People they protect.

 

Watch our enemy burn in their own terror, watch them try in a hundred ways to make you question your own belief.

Stand firm and know well how scared they are, hiding behind the lies even they don't believe~

Anonymous ID: c8de20 Dec. 15, 2019, 2:01 a.m. No.7512844   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3337

>>7512831

Found by a great anon & reposting to expand upon the insights!

 

https://news.rpi.edu/luwakkey/2902#sthash.wuHag3ob.dpuf

 

“In general, people do not like to have an unpopular opinion and are always seeking to try locally to come to consensus. We set up this dynamic in each of our models,” said SCNARC Research Associate and corresponding paper author Sameet Sreenivasan. To accomplish this, each of the individuals in the models “talked” to each other about their opinion. If the listener held the same opinions as the speaker, it reinforced the listener’s belief. If the opinion was different, the listener considered it and moved on to talk to another person. If that person also held this new belief, the listener then adopted that belief.

 

“As agents of change start to convince more and more people, the situation begins to change,” Sreenivasan said. “People begin to question their own views at first and then completely adopt the new view to spread it even further. If the true believers just influenced their neighbors, that wouldn’t change anything within the larger system, as we saw with percentages less than 10.”

 

The research has broad implications for understanding how opinion spreads. “There are clearly situations in which it helps to know how to efficiently spread some opinion or how to suppress a developing opinion,” said Associate Professor of Physics and co-author of the paper Gyorgy Korniss. “Some examples might be the need to quickly convince a town to move before a hurricane or spread new information on the prevention of disease in a rural village.”

 

The researchers are now looking for partners within the social sciences and other fields to compare their computational models to historical examples. They are also looking to study how the percentage might change when input into a model where the society is polarized. Instead of simply holding one traditional view, the society would instead hold two opposing viewpoints. An example of this polarization would be Democrat versus Republican.

Anonymous ID: c8de20 Dec. 15, 2019, 2:03 a.m. No.7512854   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7512831

covfefe = [Arabic] We will stand up

covfefe = [Antediluvian] In the end we win

It was commonly used by the sons of Adam to rail against the evil actions of the fallen who had led man astray.

 

"The Derrida Team"

Google's group responcible for censoring 'covfefe' off of the internet.

 

Named after "Jacques Derrida", a french philosopher best known for his 'Deconstruction' philosophy.

Advocated for the destruction of western civilization through the manipulation of language. Founder of Cultural Marxism and Postmodernism.

Anonymous ID: c8de20 Dec. 15, 2019, 2:04 a.m. No.7512861   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7512831

''Information Warfare: Closer than you know''

creepbot is an internal parasite; a psychological rootkit.

He has been a part of the hivemind for so long we think what he says comes from within us, thus, his words aren't assessed by our minds as 'other'.

They're ours.

A key point in advertising is to convince your their message is coming from within, an internal desire that needs to be satiated.

Otherwise the message will be rejected, and rightfully so.

creepbot is the enemies rootkit in our hivemind, and those seemingly random words have grown into beliefs amd neuro networks in our minds.

They use this rootkit to change how we think, how we feel, how we act. To censor us from our loved ones and friends, to quiet the Great Awakening.

[Enter as a Name filter] ^(?!(Anonymous$|Q$|Ron$))[Enter as a Name filter] ([])=,e

''We ask that the mods take care of his posts, delete and ban all that's required to remove this rootkit of censorship from our hivemind''