>Corney 480 times
>480 pages
Seems odd that Q would reply to that anon when they (incorrectly) said Corney 480 times
>I have questions.. like why?
My thinking: when document searches for Comey in response to FOIA and other legal reasons, conveniently this document (and others where it's misspelled) will "coincidentally" not be included in the results.
How difficult would it be to prove they KNOWINGLY misspelled it, versus trying to use the excuse that it was an OCR error?