so huma was on weiners laptop and emailing hrc?
The AUSAs provided written guidance to the case agent about how to handle
review of the laptop. In a September 28 email to the case agent and the SSA,
AUSA 1 advised that the case agent should review “only evidence of crimes related
to the sexual exploitation of children, enticement, and obscenity” and instructed the
case agent “that all emails and other communications between Anthony Weiner and
Huma Abedin (even if there are other parties to the communication) should be
sequestered and not reviewed at this time.” The case agent agreed and responded
that the “[o]nly emails I will review are those to/from Weiner accounts to which
[Huma Abedin] is not party.”
Later in the day on September 28, the AUSA-created timeline noted:
[The case agent] informed AUSAs that the header info previously
described seen in plain view search revealed numerous emails
between Abedin and HRC (on which Weiner was not a party) using
potentially sensitive email addresses, which indicated that Abedin had
used the laptop. [The case agent] said that his chain of command was
aware of the information. AUSAs informed supervisors of these facts.
Later that day, SDNY USAO and FBI NY leadership discussed situation
and agreed that Rule 41 prevented any search in this case beyond
scope of warrant, and that any emails outside that scope should be
segregated and not reviewed in this case. Same day, FBI NY ASAC []
asked AUSA to forward him the guidance for conducting the search
that the AUSA had sent to [the case agent] because FBI counsel was
interested in issuing guidance for review and seeing what we had
already said on this point.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download